Thousands of years of history, repeating itself again!千年历史,再次重演!

Whenever a disaster occurs, Hegel's famous quote always appears before our eyes:

The only thing humans can learn from history is that humans never learn from history.

Hegel (picture sourced from the Internet, invaded and deleted)

Not learning lessons and causing mistakes to happen repeatedly, from a human perspective, is "history repeating itself." And this article will give the answer from the perspective of human nature-it's not that human beings don't learn the lesson, but that they don't want to change. Even if you want to change it, you can't.

The full text consists of seven parts, nearly 4,700 words, and the reading time is about 10 minutes:

I selfish gene

II Law of Inertia

III Environmental Feedback Law

IV Zero-sum game

V civilization attribute

VI history repeats itself

VII Alternation of Civilizations

I selfish gene

All reasoning in this article is based on the "selfish gene":

Human nature is selfish, and it is possible to care for others only on the premise of self-interest. And the lowest self-interested behavior is for "survival".

The survival of the fittest in the theory of biological evolution can explain "why people are selfish" - selfishness is more beneficial in the competition for individual survival. The survival cost of the selfless people is higher. They have to face the cruel natural environment outside the tribe, and they have to face the living conditions of being squeezed out by selfish people of the same kind within the tribe. Over time, after countless rounds of natural selection, the survivors have more or less "selfish genes".

Out of "selfishness", people will develop an important guiding ideology, which dominates people's daily life and even decision-making at historical moments:

Seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. Faced with any choice, people will always calculate the pros and cons of each option for themselves, and finally make the most beneficial choice. For example, do what can make money and save worry first, and leave the difficult bones behind or throw them to others.

II Law of Inertia

This is an inference based on experience—there is also a law of inertia similar to that in physics at the level of human thought, including two points:

1. Everyone tends to respond to new events according to their own or others' past experience, which is called "inertia";

2. For a group, its inertia is proportional to the number of group members.

Inertia (the picture comes from the Internet, invaded and deleted)

The formation of inertia essentially lies in biological memory and selfish genes. In order to "seek advantages and avoid disadvantages", we will continue to collect past information to judge how to choose in the future; and those tried and tested experiences in natural selection or artificial selection have further created people's character and social civilization.

It is a pity that all information has limitations, and known information cannot deal with all unknown events. For those problems that cannot be solved by inertia, we usually call them "black swan events". In the face of such incidents, if you stick to the inherent experience, you may make a big mistake; however, if you find another way, you will always pay higher costs, and at the same time face the risk of nothing.

III Environmental Feedback Law

When we measure the pros and cons, we always have to determine the standard in advance, and this standard is often reflected in "money". Modern theories teach us many ways to quantify things to judge pros and cons, but none of them tells us to pay attention to the feedback of the surrounding environment to us (the surrounding environment generally refers to all the things and people that people can come into contact with in life, including natural environment and social environment). Because they seem unquantifiable and difficult to judge.

Here, this paper proposes a new viewpoint "Environmental Feedback Law":

The surrounding environment has feedback on any human behavior, and it needs a long enough time span to reach a measurable state. The so-called quantitative change causes qualitative change actually means that when the time span is long enough, a measurable change occurs.

This point of view is analogous to the "law of universal gravitation"-there is a gravitational force between everything, and the reason why people usually can't feel it is because the mass is too small. However, limited by the length of life, people cannot perceive the feedback of the surrounding environment, so they simply ignore it.

Newton's apple (picture sourced from the Internet, invaded and deleted)

Therefore, decisions in people's lives focus on immediate interests; even at the national level, they will not prematurely consider things a few years later (depending on the tenure of the decision-maker). As for the black swan incident, few people try to solve it-it is normal to fail to solve it, and it is best for decision makers not to seek merit but to seek no fault.

IV Zero-sum game

Any decision-making involving people involves games. Similar to the first law of thermodynamics (the law of conservation of energy), in a closed environment, the total amount of benefits remains stable; someone gains and someone loses. The game at this time is a zero-sum game.

Usually, within a certain time frame, the total amount of resources (including natural resources and population) in the world is relatively stable. The only exception is the technological explosion in the 20th century and after World War II, which caused the world's cake to grow suddenly within a few decades, but it has stabilized today.

However, people's pursuit of a better life is endless. Even if the cake does not grow, the desire will still grow. So a zero-sum game emerges—if the world is a cake for two people, if one party takes an extra bite, the other party will lose a bite.

From small organizations to large countries, zero-sum games exist everywhere. Correspondingly, there is also an "impossible triangle". Interest, work and relationship are the three corners, and one party in the game can only keep two corners at most. Guaranteed interest and relationship, you can't work together; guarantee interests and work together, you will lose relationship; guarantee work and relationship, you will lose interest.

Impossible Triangle (picture sourced from the Internet, invaded and deleted)

Is there a way to break the zero-sum game? Judging from the current human history, there are three ways to expand the cake in the group: outward plunder, backward plunder, and technological progress:

1. External plunder: including trade and war, eating other people's cakes. From the perspective of Westerners, earning their silver is equivalent to a war without gunpowder. This is why the Sino-US trade war will start.

2. Backward plundering: sacrificing future interests and eating the cake of future generations. The typical representative is the debt economy of the United States. A 13-year-old child asked Buffett: "Grandpa Buffett, you keep borrowing money. Do you want us to pay back the debt you borrowed?" Buffett said to him, "Study hard and let your grandson pay it for you."

3. Technological progress: improve the level of energy utilization, thereby increasing social productivity, and making a cake for all mankind.

Among them, outward plunder is the most classic way, and the history of mankind for thousands of years is a history of war.

V civilization attribute

Although historically, there has been no shortage of wars between the East and the West, the attributes of civilizations are quite different. Geographical location determines the attributes of civilization.

For land creatures like humans, it is much more difficult to conquer the ocean than to conquer the land. As long as there is an opportunity to expand their territory, the rulers will never think about controlling the sea. For Western civilization, the birth point in Europe is surrounded by coastlines on three sides, and the potential of the land has long been tapped; while Eastern civilization is different, the Asian continent is enough to play for thousands of years.

World map (picture sourced from the Internet, invaded and deleted)

Western civilization is an oceanic civilization, while Eastern civilization is an inland civilization.

When it comes to the ocean, many people think of the unknown and the mysterious. What kind of person will challenge the unknown and mysterious? The explorer is the portrayal of freedom. Human beings cannot change the vagaries of the sea, but they can enjoy its endlessness. Freedom is the cornerstone of marine civilization, and it is the mark engraved in the bones.

In the open ocean we feel freedom, in the crowded inland we seek harmony. The concept of inland civilization is to make everything "coordinated" and ultimately achieve harmonious coexistence.

It seems that the inland civilization is more friendly and peaceful? Not necessarily. "Coordination" does not mean "coexistence", but to change the living environment. There are two options:

1. Fusion. If you can't beat it, just merge.

2. To eliminate. If you can beat it, then do it.

Option 2 is the fastest. If both options are available, decision makers will basically give priority to option 2. There are many examples in history (from war genocide to biological species extinction, all are extermination); in modern civilization, due to the supervision and dissemination of public opinion , the decision makers had more fears, and the plan 2 was put into the cold palace.

The purpose of "coordination" is always unpretentious:

The world is too crowded, and only by coordinating with each other can we make each other comfortable; or, simply eliminate you, so that the world will not be so crowded.

"Freedom" and "coordination" are two ways of civilization's survival, and there is no distinction between superior and inferior. They are by no means isolated, just like yin and yang always coexist, there is me in you, and you in me. It's just that marine civilizations are more inclined to "freedom", while inland civilizations are more inclined to "coordination". Many contradictions between Eastern and Western civilizations are rooted in this.

VI history repeats itself

With the above basic theoretical reserves, we can now begin to explain the repetition of history.

History repeating itself can be divided into two categories:

1. Social reenactment: A reenactment caused by human behavior, usually with a cycle of several years to decades. For a cycle within a few years, it is recorded as a short cycle; for a cycle of several decades, it is recorded as a long cycle.

2. Natural recurrence: The recurrence caused by the natural environment has not been found yet.

For social reenactment, we rely on memory to trace, and for natural reenactment, we rely more on historical data. Looking forward to decades or even centuries in the future, history can be traced back in the form of audio-visual graphics. Maybe people in the 22nd century will get used to studying the lifestyles of "ancient people" in the 21st century through various official accounts.

History is composed of countless events; events are all dominated by people. All "replays" are closely related to our way of doing things.

Social repetition (short cycle): the product of maximizing the interests of decision makers

According to the "selfish gene", we know that the decision maker of any matter will always find a way to maximize his own interests, and the safest way is to make decisions according to the "law of inertia".

The length of life is unknown, but the length of tenure is known. Leaving the old position before winter, arriving at the new position before autumn, skipping the stage of loss and reserve, and going straight to the stage of growth and harvest is the way to maximize the interests of decision makers. Therefore, the tenure of a decision maker's post is often shorter or slightly shorter than a short cycle. Essentially, it is because decision makers will try their best to avoid "wintering" during their term of office when making decisions.

We will experience many such short cycles in our lifetime, such as the construction cycle of a city. When you see a good pavement being dug up and resurfaced, it may just be because the decision maker has changed.

Rise, rise! do not stop!

Social Reenactment (Long Cycle): A Forced Ending of a Drumming Pass

However, winter always comes. Therefore, decision makers will use the two methods mentioned in the "Zero-sum Game" section to escape the winter: outward plunder and backward plunder. In practice, both methods are common. However, according to the "environmental feedback law", no matter how you plunder the future, you will pay a price.

Everything is like beating a drum to pass flowers, and the decision-maker must not let the drum stop before leaving the field. But over time, the drum always stops, unhinged by any will, which is the future of debt collection. There is a beginning and an end, and there is a rise and a fall.

This is the long cycle that we go through more than once in our lifetime. One of the most common forms is an economic/financial crisis.

When there is a high tide, there is a low tide

Nature Repeating Itself: Forced Zeroing Caused by Natural Disasters

For humans, nature has always been mysterious. Since it is unknowable, it is not within human planning; for those natural disasters that have never been experienced in a lifetime, the probability of occurrence can be considered zero. Like a grasshopper, there is no need to think about how to survive the winter.

From ancient times to the present, "the minority obeys the majority" has been an important basis for human decision-making; in response to emergencies, it is also low probability (minority) that gives way to high probability (majority). Therefore, for those natural disasters that exist in theory but have never occurred in fact, people are always neglecting to formulate a response plan-the cost of response is too high, and the benefits can only be reflected when the disaster occurs, which is not in line with decision makers and the general public. the interests of some people.

Resources are limited, if they are all invested in the future, how will we live today? Instead of doing everything possible to prevent future disasters, it is better to resign to the fate of the present. Therefore, rare natural disasters, such as major earthquakes and new infectious diseases, always cause heavy losses to human beings. Ironically, it is people's usual "seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages" that amplifies the destructive effects of natural disasters.

Natural disasters (pictures are from the Internet, invaded and deleted)

After a disaster, do people know how to improve? Won't. Since these disasters will not be encountered a second time in our lifetime, let future generations consider future disasters. For example, no one would have thought that 17 years after SRAS, the new crown virus broke out.

Limited by the lack of knowledge and the high cost, human beings often can only make up for natural disasters. "Lost sheep" represents the end of the previous stage, and "repair" is the beginning of a new stage. 2020 is the time to make up for it; the destructive power and consequences of this time are enough to be recorded in history.

VII Alternation of Civilizations

There are many views that tend to classify "epidemic" disasters as man-made disasters rather than natural disasters, on the grounds that policymakers' inaction cost people a lot. In this article, it is still a natural disaster (act of God) for two reasons:

1. Infectious diseases are a feedback from the natural environment to humans. The source starts from nature, not man-made.

2. The thinking of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages, so that people will not pay a huge price to strive for unknown benefits. Only when disasters happen can people pay attention to them.

Even when disaster is imminent, earnest preaching is still useless. People cannot be persuaded. Our so-called persuasion is nothing more than awakening the part of the other party's body that agrees with us through words. So how to make the other party's body produce "the part that agrees with yourself"? Give TA lessons through the environment, let TA always remember. All the immersion and empathy are because they have been in the situation and suffered from it before.

This is true for individuals, not to mention society, and even the entire civilization system? It is impossible to gain experience without paying a terrible price. Compared with the natural disasters hundreds of years ago, the progress of science and technology only makes human beings slightly understand why they are punished by nature, but they still cannot escape the punishment.

In the face of "contagion", different "civilization attributes" pay very different prices. Civilizations that advocate "freedom" will be more traumatized than civilizations that value "coordination" - the more emphasis on individuality and freedom, the more contagious it will be fast. Of course, everything has two sides. In terms of innovation and exploration, "free" civilizations will have more advantages. This is why Western civilization has spread more widely and led several technological revolutions. It's just that the natural disasters in 2020 pushed the two types of civilizations to the point of alternation.

The severe damage to civilization is not the demise of race, but the change of spirit and belief. When "freedom" is no longer emphasized, the essence of marine civilization is also dimmed. All civilizations are nothing more than the social inertia accumulated by human beings in the long-term survival process. After all, they still have to make concessions in front of survival.

The "free" age of navigation has long since ended, and a more "free" space age is far from coming. During this time limited to the earth, only "coordination" can make people feel more secure in their existence.

Earth, the only home

epilogue

This article contains many brain-hole-level ideas and inferences. However, it is always simple to put forward ideas, but the process of verification is long and arduous—so, in line with the principle of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages, leave the opportunity of verification to future generations. !

When I was teaching the text "Hongmen Banquet", I spent a lot of time discussing the reasons for Xiang Yu's failure with my students.

The purpose of my doing this is to diverge students' thinking and give them more materials for composition.

At that time, I asked the whole class: Qin Shihuang, Liu Bang, Xiang Yu, who among them are of the same generation?

Not surprisingly, most students think that Qin Shihuang is much older than Liu Bang and Xiang Yu, and Liu Bang and Xiang Yu are of the same generation.

I shook my head and told my students, "This is a common historical illusion."

They were quite astonished.

I continue to explain.

In fact, Qin Shihuang was only 3 years older than Liu Bang, and Liu Bang was 24 years older than Xiang Yu.

In other words, if Qin Shihuang was born in 1965, then Liu Bang was born in 1968, and Xiang Yu was born in 1992, a proper post-90s generation.

I tell the students that the Chu-Han struggle is actually a story of Liu Bang, born in the 1960s, and Xiang Yu, born in the 1990s, fighting for the world.

I will further guide and let everyone think of Han Xin's evaluation of Xiang Yu: the courage of a man, the benevolence of a woman.

Then let them think about the reasons for Xiang Yu's failure based on Xiang Yu's age.

The students discussed each other with each other, and later many students came to the conclusion: "Xiang Yu was too young at that time."

I later concluded: "We can say that Xiang Yu is arrogant, brave, and benevolent. But we can't be harsh, after all, he was only in his early 20s at that time, and he was immature in all aspects. What he faced was Mature old man Liu Bang.

I told them that Xiang Yu's failure has always been discussed a lot, but it is also a perspective to understand from the perspective of age and psychological maturity. To accumulate materials, one should not draw new ideas, but must have one's own thinking. The core of composition is the display of ideas, not the accumulation of materials and rhetoric.

The so-called "history" has three meanings: the past development process of human society; the record of past events; and human history understanding.

From the first explanation, we know that history includes endless, various events, events, things, and states of affairs, ranging from social forms, countries, and nations, to the joys, sorrows, sorrows, and joys of personal life. , The process of formation, development, conversion, change, and end of things. The history mentioned here is an objective existence, or it can be called "original history".

Since there is an "original history", there is also a "non-original history". Here we have noticed that the objectively existing "original history" is something that has passed, and historical things are in the past time period, and time cannot be stopped or reversed. In other words, for us, the "original history" that objectively existed no longer exists. Therefore, we must and can only know it according to its "carrier" that we can touch, or through an intermediary, which is the record of history and the remains of the past left behind.

The most important of these is the history of the past recorded in writing, which we can collectively call "written history." In this way, we have "non-original history" that is not the original objectively existing history.

This is the second meaning of the word "history".

In other words, we look at past history through the eyes of others, and understand past history through others' understanding of history. This is an indirect understanding, that is, to understand the original history through a carrier and intermediary. In this way, the "carrier" of past history or the "intermediary" of understanding the past is expanded from "written history" or "historical description" to include the physical objects left over from the past and the historical things in real life, that is, the recorded "recorded" ", not only understood as a description of words, but also contains the meaning of "carrier". They are all relying on materials for understanding history, and it can be said that they are all "historical materials". Regardless of the extent to which historical data reflect the real and original history, or even whether it is true or false, it is always an objective existence and the basis for us to understand history.

The task of historical science is to seek the truth, even if our historical understanding is consistent with the real and objective history, it can reflect the reality of objective history, describe the past history, and make the past reappear in front of people. However, the past cannot be restored. The history written by history seems to be restored, but in fact it is only a copy, a shadow of past history. The original and objective history does not matter whether you believe it or not, but the history written and the history you know can be divided into whether you believe it or not. Believe it or not depends on whether what is written is consistent with the original history. The written history and the original history are not the same thing. The relationship between them is the difference between the original and the copy, and the difference between the original form and the image. Past and original history is an objective existence, while written history is a subjective understanding. Written history is also an objective existence, but it is an objective existence of the subjective understanding of historians. All knowledge is the subjective cognition of human beings to the objective. Subjective cognition can never be completely consistent with the objective object it knows. Generally speaking, cognition is at best a relative truth.

This is the third meaning of "history".

Under our mediation, after the reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the whole world is like a storm, changing every day!

Absolutely turbulent!

In the past many years, many people with incomparable strengths came forward, but they were unable to mediate good things. In this short month, the momentum was overwhelming, and many things were resolved.

So, what happened recently?

The first thing is: the most intractable contradiction in the Middle East will soon be solved!

What contradiction?

The conflict between Saudi Arabia and the Houthi armed forces in Yemen!

The armed conflict between the two has been as long as 8 years!

How to solve it?

Recently, it was reported that Saudi Arabia, together with the Omani delegation, went to Sanaa, the capital of Yemen, to negotiate with Houthi armed officials and reach a permanent ceasefire agreement.

Houthi leader Mohammad Ali Houthi has met with the head of the Saudi delegation, Mohammad al-Jaber!

Saudi Arabia and the Houthis are two sides in the conflict.

What about Oman?

Is the mediator of the two.

Before this meeting, Saudi Arabia was down-to-earth and first showed its sincerity: released 13 prisoners from the Houthi armed forces!

So far, it may not be clear why Saudi Arabia and the Houthi armed forces are the most difficult conflict in the Middle East.

So I have to add some background.

Let’s start with the sect of Muslims.

Many people should know that there are mainly two factions: one is Sunni, and Saudi Arabia is now the leader of this faction; the other is Shia, and Iran is the leader.

Map of Middle Eastern sects, pay attention to the red circle, because it will be mentioned below

Why are there two factions?

It is a bit similar to the problem that our ancient emperor encountered when he was old and how to choose an heir.

One faction advocates "meritocracy", in simple terms, it means that whoever does it will win, regardless of blood relationship;

What about the other faction?

They advocate blood relationship, and feel that Muslim leaders must be descendants of the Prophet.

The "virtuous" faction is the Sunni sect.

Those who advocate blood relationship are Shiites.

Under these two big factions, there are still many small factions that can be separated.

After understanding this, let’s start with the topography of the Arabian Peninsula.

Did you notice?

The Arabian Peninsula is actually quite interesting: close to the Red Sea, from northwest to southeast, there is a tall mountain range, and other places, and then slowly slope down from this mountain range to the Persian Gulf.

This mountain range is called the Serrat Range.

It's interesting: the further southeast you go, the higher the altitude.

When the altitude is high, the moisture in the air can be blocked, and orographic rain will appear. In some places, it can even reach 1000 mm, and green trees can grow and farmland can be opened up.

Rice terraces in the mountains of Serrat

What about the rest of the Arabian Peninsula?

Except for a little bit of Oman, the precipitation in other places is basically less than 100 mm!

It became a desert area.

Anyway how to say?

The old saying back home in Saudi Arabia is wrong: knowing that you may die there, but there will always be a desert you want to cross.

The Arabian Peninsula is not all deserts, it is also a place full of greenery!

The most green place is called Yemen!

As long as you are a human, if you don't really have no choice, you definitely don't like living in the desert.

Arabs do.

Therefore, this green place has been enviously called "Happy Arabia" by people from other parts of the peninsula since ancient times.

What does the name "Yemen" mean?

It is "happiness".

Almost 100 years ago, when Ibn Saud established Saudi Arabia, in addition to the traditional sites of Najd and Hijaz, he also swung south along the Red Sea and ate a large piece of "Happy Arabia".

Although not all happiness can be obtained, some happiness is also good!

As a result, a distant cause is planted.

What's the matter?

The "Happy Arabia" that Ibn Saud swallowed was inhabited by Zaidites, not Sunnis, though they were also Arabs.

This is the origin of the red circle above that everyone should pay attention to.

This Zade faction is also quite strange.

Many news reports now say that it is a branch of the Shia sect. In fact, for a long time, the Shiites in Iran and Iraq did not think that they were of the same clan at all!

Because of this distant cause, there is a proximate cause.

We all know that in the deserts of Saudi Arabia, very rich oil and natural gas were discovered, and suddenly became very rich.

After it became rich, it thought about how to use money to cross the border between Saudi Arabia and Yemen to promote its own set of teachings.

De Pai suddenly felt a lot of pressure.

How to do it?

The older generation first decided to learn from the West, set up a truth party, and wanted to win the election.

But this span is too big, and it fails every time.

What about the younger generation?

They took the lower-level route and set up a religious organization called "Youth Believers."

It works well and is very popular.

The leader was a scion of a religious family named Hussein Hussein.

He looks quite like Lu Liangwei.

Yemeni President Saleh felt that the situation was not good, so he hurried to suppress it without saying a word.

What about Hussein Houthi?

Maybe the level of education is not very high, and he doesn't have any ideas of his own. Maybe because the Zaidites and Iranian Shiites have a little similarity in basic teachings, he borrowed Iranian slogans and cursed Saleh is pro-US and pro-Israel.

Then raise the banner and fight against Saleh.

This Yemeni version of Lu Liangwei was even more miserable: he died after fighting for a long time.

His father, Badaldine Husse, took the case and inherited... a bit of chaos here, his son's behest, and led everyone and Saleh to the end.

Any armed force must display a banner.

Even the anti-government armed forces in the wild valleys of Africa often use the fashionable banner of "National League for Democracy" or something.

This armed force does not follow the usual path. Everyone said: In order to commemorate Hussein Houthi, we are called "Houthi armed forces"!

Everyone is from the mountains, and what they pay attention to is reality.

So those vain things will not be done.

What is the extent of this armament?

To give an example: the Iranians looked at it, hey, why did such an armed force rise in the southwest of Saudi Arabia?

So he quickly sent someone to serve as a military adviser there.

So some Western reporters asked the Houthis: I heard that Iran sent military advisers to you. Is there such a thing?

This is simply a trap.

The contradiction between Saudi Arabia and Iran is very serious. In addition, its founding king has swallowed a large piece of "Happy Arabia", and the people living on it are Zaidites.

The place where the Zaid faction lives in its territory is connected with the Houthi armed forces!

Saudi Arabia must be afraid of affecting it!

How did the Houthis answer such an obvious trap?

They said: The Iranians did send military advisers, but we ignored them, they were just hanging out!

The result is good, one sentence offends both sides.

What the Saudis heard: Iran sent military advisers!

What the Iranians heard was: the military advisers we sent, the Houthi armed forces simply ignored them!

So the Saudis decided to fight it.

But being so honest also has an advantage: when we get along, things are simpler.

Therefore, the combat effectiveness of the Houthi armed forces is relatively strong.

how to say?

Although they are disheveled, they are just a group of troops wearing slippers, but when fighting, the Saudi troops not only often suffer, but often suffer greatly.

For example, once, a light armored brigade in Saudi Arabia was ambushed by the Houthi armed forces. In fact, only one armored vehicle was destroyed, but the Saudi troops were frightened, and all abandoned the vehicle and fled. The equipment of a brigade was just given away for nothing. Armed the Houthis.

After Iran knew about it, its unhappiness disappeared immediately, and it was very happy.

It hurriedly and secretly sent all kinds of guns, missiles, drones, etc. to the Houthi armed forces.

What about the Houthis?

It is also very useful, and often creates miracles.

The results of it?

The territory of the Houthis is constantly expanding.

The territory of the Saudis and their supporters is constantly shrinking, and now it has reached the point of confrontation.

Everyone can't stand each other.

The Saudis are riding a tiger.

What about Americans?

In the name of protecting the Saudi territory from Houthi armed attacks, they stationed in Saudi Arabia. 2,500 American soldiers live in a base near its capital, Riyadh!

After the Khashoggi incident in 2018, why did Saudi Arabia have to spend $100 billion to buy American arms after being scolded bloody by the Americans?

It can't help!

There is Iran in the distance, and the Houthi armed forces nearby. What about at home?

There are these 2,500 American soldiers!

The result is: Saudi Arabia and the Houthi armed forces are fighting each other, and the American fisherman is benefiting!

With that amount alone, the per capita income of US soldiers stationed in Saudi Arabia is as high as 40 million US dollars!

The conflict between Saudi Arabia and the Houthi armed forces has both religious and historical reasons, as well as the reason for the competition between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and the reason for the United States. Is it extremely complicated?

Is it the most intractable contradiction in the Middle East?

Otherwise, the Americans wouldn't open their mouths so loudly and come up with such a high per capita income.

At this point, everyone understands: the reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and the Houthi armed forces not only means that everyone no longer has to fight, but also eliminates the reason for the US military to be stationed in Saudi Arabia!

In the future, the per capita income of the US military will be 40 million U.S. dollars, which will never happen again!

For Saudi Arabia, it can also get rid of a heart problem, and there is no need to worry about the U.S. military's elbow and armpit changes!

Let's talk about the second thing: In the past two days, Brazil and Argentina, the two major South American countries, have successively: We are going to return to the South American Nations League!

What is the Union of South American Nations?

On paper, the scale is huge:

Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Venezuela, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, Guyana and Suriname, a total of 12, basically covering the entire South America.

There are also two observer states: Mexico and Panama.

What about ambition?

It's also quite ambitious.

After the establishment of this alliance in 2004, everyone clamored for various good ideas:

We want to engage in a unified South American market!

We want to establish a unified South American central bank and issue a unified currency!

We also want to build a unified South American army!

Just listening to slogans, Klass is absolutely awesome, and he is in such a mess that he wants to compete in the Americas and the United States.

So the question arises: Do Americans want such an alliance to exist?

Obviously don't want it!

Then something went wrong.

After the alliance was established, Colombia at that time had a good relationship with the Americans!

It first found fault with Venezuela, which made the Venezuelans very unhappy; then sent troops across the border to Ecuador, which made Ecuador furious.

There is another country that also has a good relationship with the United States.

Peru!

The President of Bolivia at the time was Evo Morales. The Peruvians said that he had made a mistake and announced the recall of the ambassador.

The two had another fight.

After that, anyway, from time to time, some countries jumped out, found a small problem, and quarreled with other countries.

Why is this happening?

There is America behind it!

Then in 2018, the right wing of South American politics at that time, that is, the pro-American group of people resurged. In that year, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay and Peru announced the suspension of participation in the Union of South American Nations.

This alliance is dead in name only.

Because countries with a larger area and a larger population almost all ran away!

Brazil and Argentina are big countries in South America!

Their return means that the alliance that gave the United States such a headache and finally dismantled is back!

So this is another big change!

Speaking of this, I don’t know if you have noticed: it has only been almost a month since the Sino-Shaikh joint statement on March 10, but a lot of things have happened in this month!

The pattern of the whole world has changed a lot because of this. Why did these things happen all of a sudden?

Simply put, it's time.

This short month is very similar to a past event that happened in the state of Jin in the Spring and Autumn Period more than 2,000 years ago.

What's the matter?

The three families wiped out their wits!

In the late Spring and Autumn Period, the entire state of Jin was controlled by four families.

The most powerful family is Zhishi.

Its head is Zhibo. According to historical records, this man is very powerful, tall and handsome; he is skilled in martial arts, good at archery and driving; he is not only good at martial arts, but also literary. Debate, the diction is beautiful; his character is also strong and resolute, decisive and brave.

How to describe it?

Absolute hexagon talent.

The Zhi family is the most powerful, and the most capable family member, so there are younger brothers to follow.

One is the Wei family and the other is the Han family.

slaughter

All belong to four families.

Among the four families, only one refused to accept Zhi Shi.

Zhao!

Three to one, that is a must-win battle.

So Zhibo felt that he would definitely win, and he was not very polite to Wei and Han, so he asked them for land.

What about these two?

They were also afraid of Zhishi, so they gave him all the good land.

But what about in the heart?

It must be extremely unpleasant!

After Zhibo got the land of the two families, he became even more arrogant, and sent someone to go to the Zhao family to ask for the land.

Seeing Zhao's refusal, Zhibo was furious, and called the Wei and Han families to beat the Zhao family. Those two families were afraid of him, so they dispatched troops to fight together.

The Zhao family, how can they beat three families?

Can only stick to Jinyang City.

What about Zhibo?

He was very clever. Seeing that it was difficult to attack the city, he dug the embankment of the Fen River and poured water from the Fen River to irrigate the city.

The city was quickly flooded, and people crowded on the walls.

The city wall at that time was made of earth, and if it was soaked in water for a long time, it would easily collapse.

Zhibo asked the head of the Wei family to drive for him, and the head of the Han family served as his guard. While watching the water, he said triumphantly: Now, I know that water can also destroy a country!

The faces of the heads of the Wei and Han families suddenly changed.

Because the capitals of their two families, like the Zhao family, were built by the river!

Just at this moment, the Zhao family sent someone to contact them and said bluntly: "Zhao's today is your tomorrow!" If the Zhao family is destroyed, it will be your two's turn next!

Wei and Han gritted their teeth and decided to form an alliance with the Zhao family.

On the same day, the three families joined forces to attack Zhi Shi's army, and finally got rid of Zhi Shi. That hexagonal talent, Bo Claes, who was awesome, also died in the hands of Zhao Shi.

Seeing this, do you think: Biden is actually quite similar to Zhibo?

At first, he also had a bunch of younger brothers, such as Europe, such as Japan and South Korea.

Like Zhibo, Biden was ruthless when he started.

For example, he caused a war between Russia and Ukraine through fighting, so that European countries had to follow the lead of the United States;

The war made it difficult for Russia's natural gas to enter Europe, and the United States sold high-priced gas to Europe;

The United States is also taking advantage of the energy shortage in Europe, attracting many European companies to enter the United States!

So we have always said that he is confident and methodical.

This is not to belittle him, but to say that he does have a few brushes.

Since it is so awesome, why has the United States not been going well in the past two years?

Because the United States has also made the same mistakes as Zhibo: like launching a technological war against us, and stuck our necks on chips; like crazily sanctioning Russia, confiscating Russia's overseas assets, and kicking it out of the swift system.

This is similar to Zhibo diverting water from the Fen River to irrigate Zhao's Jinyang City.

The vast majority of countries in the world are afraid of it!

Because today, the United States can use these tactics to deal with Russia and us. Tomorrow, if it doesn’t like anyone, won’t it use these tactics to deal with other countries?

So what to do?

Since the United States is such a big threat, if everyone can reconcile, they must quickly reconcile;

On the whole, everyone is scared, how can the United States go smoothly?

Anything under such a background will of course be messed up!

So when our counterattack started, in this short month, the whole world has actually changed drastically.

We have said before: in politics and diplomacy, the most important thing is to make yourself the intersection of the interests of all parties. Once you are at this intersection, everything will go smoothly. The world opens and closes for you, and the wind and cloud for you Discoloration. If you leave, no matter how strong your country is and how many troops you have, you will eventually fail.

After Biden came to power, what he did was to let the United States leave this intersection.

Why in the last month, but as soon as we launched a counterattack, Biden's entire layout fell apart, with holes everywhere? This is the reason behind it!

It's true: the organ was too clever to calculate, and it cost Qingqing's life instead!

Four Great Mothers in Ancient China

1. Mother Meng


Mengmu is the mother of Mencius in the Warring States Period, ranking first among the "Four Great Mothers". Her son, Mencius, was a famous thinker and educator in ancient China, and a master of Confucianism second only to Confucius, and was known as "the second sage". The reason why Meng's mother can cultivate such an excellent son is all because of her careful education of her children. Her most widely praised deed is the story of "Meng's mother moved three times".


Meng's mother lost her husband in her early years, but she did not want to remarry. She raised Mencius alone through hardships. At the beginning, she and Mencius lived near her husband's tomb so that she could go to worship him every day. It's just that after living in this kind of place for a long time, the young Mencius actually learned the crying and nonsense of funeral people. Mother Meng felt that such a living environment was not conducive to the growth of her children, so she moved her family to the market. But after moving his family to the market, Mencius followed the example of peddlers and started a hawking business. Mother Meng didn't want her son to become a villain in the market in the future, so she moved her family near the school. From then on, Mencius followed the scholars in the school and learned to "study hard and make progress every day". The reason why Meng's mother moved three times is because she knows a truth: "The environment will affect a person's growth."


Mother Meng also had a story about "a child who does not learn, but breaks the loom". She taught Mencius that if you give up your studies halfway, it is like a half-woven piece of cloth, which cannot be used by others. Similarly, if a person does not study hard when he is young, he can only do some hard labor when he grows up, which is useless. From then on, Mencius studied hard and became a generation of Confucian scholars.


2. Mother Tao


Tao Mu is the mother of Tao Kan in the Eastern Jin Dynasty. Tao Kan was a famous general of his generation, and he made great achievements in stabilizing the turbulent political situation in the early years of the Eastern Jin Dynasty. At that time, Tao's mother's story of "cutting off the banquet" and "closing the altar and withdrawing the fish" was also widely circulated.


Tao Kan was an orphan when he was young, and his family was poor. Mother Tao also lost her husband in her early years. She worked hard to make ends meet by spinning and weaving hemp, and supported Tao Kan to study. In terms of teaching children, Mother Tao has always taught her son that to make friends, one must make friends with people who are more qualified and educated than herself.


Once, Fan Kui, Xiaolian (that is, Juren) from the same county, visited Xian and encountered heavy snow, so he stayed at Tao Kan's house. When the weather was cold and the horses had no fodder, Mother Tao took off the straw mats on her bed and chopped them up to feed the horses. Because her family was poor and had no way to entertain guests, Mother Tao secretly cut off her long hair and sold it to her neighbors. , Change money to buy food and drink. In the Chinese concept, "the body, hair and skin, are subject to parents, who dare not damage them, and filial piety begins with the beginning", so hair should not be cut easily. Mother Tao's behavior in this way shows her sincerity in hospitality. Therefore, Fan Kui was greatly moved, and recommended Tao Kan to be appointed as a doctor by the county magistrate. Since then, Tao Kan has embarked on a prosperous official career. This is the allusion of "cutting off the banquet".


Tao Mu also has a well-known story of "Sealing the altar and retreating the fish". Tao Kan used to be a county official in Haiyang, Zhejiang Province, supervising the fishery, and his subordinates often gave him things. Once, a subordinate gave Tao Kan a jar of fish bream (pickled fish). The filial Tao Kan immediately thought of his loving mother who had lived in poverty in the countryside all her life, and asked the villagers to bring it to her. Unexpectedly, my mother returned the altar of fish untouched, and wrote in the letter: "As an official, leaving me with official things will not only not benefit me, but also increase my worries." ("Book of Jin" Volume 96 "Biography of Tao Kan's Mother Zhan")


Tao Kan was shocked and felt guilty when he received the fish and reply letter from his mother. He made up his mind to follow his mother's teaching all his life: to be a clean person and to be a clean official.


Later generations praised: "The mother of the world is like Zhan's who can teach her sons, so why does the country have no talent to use? But the use of the world is unreasonable?" (Ming Zhang Jiushao "Rebuilding Tao Muji Ji" ; Kangxi "Xingan County Chronicles" Volume 14 "Yiwenzhi Ji")


Three, the mother


Ou Mu is the mother of Ouyang Xiu in the Northern Song Dynasty. Ouyang Xiu was an outstanding statesman, writer, and historian in the Northern Song Dynasty, but his achievements were also inseparable from his mother's great education.


Oumu is also a single mother. Her husband passed away when her son was four years old, leaving her alone to support her son. When Ouyang Xiu's father was alive, the family was relatively well-off, but since his death, the family situation has plummeted and become poorer day by day. Later, it came to the point where "there is no room, and there is no row of land". It is conceivable that orphans and widows live in such a situation.


Ou Mu is a strong-willed woman. Her family is poor and ambitious. She raised her son through her own hard work and taught Ouyang Xiu how to read in the most primitive way. When he was young, Oumu taught him the principles of reading, writing, and how to behave. It’s just that the family was poor at the time, and the family had no money to buy pens, ink, paper and inkstones, so Ou Mu had to use reed sticks instead, and then spread some sand on the ground, using the ground as paper, and taught Ouyang Xiu to write stroke by stroke.


A child from a poor family was in charge of the family early. Under the careful guidance of his mother, Ouyang Xiu was very sensible, so he worked hard and achieved excellent academic performance. He was a high school scholar in the eighth year of Renzong Tiansheng (AD 1030).


During his tenure as an official, Ouyang Xiu actively supported Fan Zhongyan in maintaining the new law, and was later demoted because of this. But Oumu did not complain about his son's poor career, but comforted his son and said: "You are demoted for justice. It is not disgraceful. Our family is used to living a poor life. As long as you have no burden on your mind and your spirit is not weak, I am happy." With a mother like this, how can a son not be great?


Four, mother-in-law


The mother-in-law is the mother of Yue Fei, a famous general in the Northern Song Dynasty. When Yue Fei was 15 or 16 years old, the Jin people in the north invaded the south, and the rulers in power in the Song Dynasty were corrupt and incompetent, retreating steadily, and the country was at the juncture of life and death. Many selfish mothers do not want their children to go to the front line, hoping to preserve the blood of their children during the war. But the mother-in-law is different from ordinary mothers. She is righteous and takes the initiative to encourage her son to join the army and serve the country faithfully. In order to let her son always remember the admonition of "serving the country with loyalty and loyalty", she even tattooed these four words on Yue Fei's back with an embroidery needle!


Thanks to the active encouragement of his mother-in-law, after joining the army, Yue Fei bravely killed the enemy without hesitation. Once when Kaifeng, the capital of Song Dynasty, was besieged by the Jin army, Yue Fei went to the rescue with the deputy marshal Zong Ze. He defeated the Jin army many times and was appreciated by Zong Ze, who praised him as "wisdom, bravery and talent, Gu Liang will not be able to pass".


Later, Yue Fei became a well-known anti-golden hero of a generation, and was admired by people of all ages.


These are the "Four Great Mothers" in ancient China. The stories of their teaching children fully illustrate the importance and greatness of mother education. 

每当发生灾难的时候,黑格尔的名言总是会出现在我们眼前:

人类唯一能从历史中吸取的教训就是,人类从来都不会从历史中吸取教训。
黑格尔(图片来源自网络,侵删)

不吸取教训、导致错误往复发生,在人类的角度上看,就是「历史的重演」。而本文将从人性的角度给出答案——不是人类不吸取教训,而是不想改。就算想改,也改不了。

全文共七部分,近4700字,阅读时间约10分钟:

I 自私的基因
II 惯性定律
III 环境反馈定律
IV 零和博弈
V 文明属性
VI 历史的重演
VII 文明的交替

I 自私的基因

本文全部推理建立在「自私的基因」上:

人性是自私的,在利己的前提下,才有可能顾他。而最底层的利己行为,是为了「生存」。

生物进化论的优胜劣汰可以解释「人为什么自私」——自私,在个体生存的竞争中更有利。无私者的生存成本更高,他们在部落外要面对残酷的自然环境,在部落内要面临着被自私的同类挤占生存条件。久而久之,经历了无数轮自然选择后,幸存者们都或多或少带着「自私的基因」。

DNA(图片来源自网络,侵删)

出于「自私」,人们会萌生一个重要的指导思想,它主导了人们的日常生活、乃至历史时刻的决策:

趋利避害。面对任何一种选择,人们总是会计算各个选项对自己的利弊,最终做出最有利的选择。比如,先做能赚钱又省心的,把难啃的骨头留在后面或抛给别人。

II 惯性定律

这是一个根据经验得出的推论——在人的思想层面也存在着与物理学中相似的惯性定律,其中包括两点:

1. 每个人都倾向于按照自己或他人过往的经验来应对新事件,该倾向称之为「惯性」;
2. 对于群体来说,其惯性大小与群体成员的数量成正比。
惯性(图片来源自网络,侵删)

惯性的形成,本质上在于生物的记忆与自私的基因。为了「趋利避害」,我们会不断收集过往信息来判断未来如何选择;而那些在自然选择或人工选择中屡试不爽的经验进一步造就了人们的性格与社会的文明。

可惜的是,一切信息都有局限性,已知信息无法应对所有的未知事件。对于那些惯性解决不了的问题,我们通常称之为「黑天鹅事件」。面对此类事件,如果执着于固有经验,很可能造就大错;然而,若另辟蹊径,总是会付出更高成本,同时面临着竹篮打水一场空的风险。

III 环境反馈定律

我们在衡量利弊时,总是要事先确定标准,这个标准往往体现在「钱」上。现代理论教给我们很多将事物量化的方法来判断利弊,但是并没有一个理论告诉我们——注意周边环境对我们的反馈(周边环境泛指人在生活中所能接触到的全部事物与人,包括自然环境与社会环境)。因为,它们看起来无法量化,难以判断。

在此,本文提出一个新观点「环境反馈定律」:

周边环境对人的任何行为都有反馈,它需要经过足够长的时间跨度才能达到可衡量态。所谓的量变引起质变,实际上指的就是当时间跨度足够长时,产生了可衡量的变化。

该观点类比了「万有引力定律」——万物之间都存在引力,人们平时之所以感觉不到它,是因为质量太小了。而受限于生命的长度,人们也无法感知到周边环境的反馈,于是干脆忽略了。

牛顿的苹果(图片来源自网络,侵删)

所以,人们生活中的决策都着重于眼前利益;即使到了国家层面,也不会过早考虑若干年后的事(取决于决策者的任期)。至于黑天鹅事件,更鲜有人尝试解决了——解决不了是常态,不求有功、但求无过对决策者最有利。

IV 零和博弈

凡是涉及到与人相关的决策,都少不了博弈。与热力学第一定律(能量守恒定律)相似,在一个封闭的环境内,其利益总量保持稳定;有人得利,便有人失利。此时的博弈便是零和博弈。

通常情况下,在一定的时间范围内,全世界的资源(包括自然资源与人口)总量是相对稳定的。仅有20世纪、二战后的科技爆发是个例外,使得全世界的蛋糕在几十年内骤然变大,不过时至今日亦已趋于稳定。

然而人们对更好的生活的追求是没有尽头的。即使蛋糕不增大,欲望还是要增长。于是零和博弈出现了——如果说世界是两个人的蛋糕,一方多咬了一口,另一方就少了一口。

小到组织,大到国家,处处都存在着零和博弈。相应地,也存在着一个「不可能三角」,利益、共事与关系是三个角,博弈中的一方最多只能保住两个角。保证利益与关系,则无法共事;保证利益与共事,则损失关系;保证共事与关系,则损失利益。

不可能的三角(图片来源自网络,侵删)

有办法破除零和博弈吗?从目前的人类历史上看,有向外掠夺、向后掠夺与科技进步三种方式做大群体内的蛋糕:

1. 向外掠夺:包括贸易与战争,吃掉别人的蛋糕。以西方人的眼光看,赚他们的白银相当于没有硝烟的战争。这也是为什么,中美贸易战会打响的原因。
2. 向后掠夺:牺牲未来的利益,吃掉后人的蛋糕。典型代表是美国的借债经济。一个13岁小孩问巴菲特:「巴菲特爷爷,你不断借债,你借的债,将来是不是要我们还?」巴菲特对他说:「好好学习,让你的孙子替你还。」
3. 科技进步:提升能源的利用水平,进而提升社会生产力,做大全人类的蛋糕。

其中,向外掠夺是最经典的方式,几千年来的人类历史就是一部战争史。

V 文明属性

尽管历史上看,东方与西方都不乏战争,但文明属性却大为不同。地理位置决定了文明属性。

对于人类这种陆地生物而言,征服海洋的难度要比征服陆地大得多。只要有机会扩张领土,统治者们绝不会想着控制海域。对于西方文明来说,位于欧洲的出生点三面都是海岸线,陆地的潜力早被挖掘一空;而东方文明就不一样了,亚洲大陆就够玩上几千年。

世界地图(图片来源自网络,侵删)

西方文明是海洋文明,东方文明是内陆文明。

说到海洋,很多人会想到未知与神秘。什么样的人才会挑战未知与神秘?探险家,是自由的写照。人类改变不了大海的变幻莫测,但可以享受它的无穷无尽。自由是海洋文明的基石,刻在骨子里的印记。

在空旷的海洋中我们感受自由,在拥挤的内陆上我们谋求协调。内陆文明的理念,是使万事万物达到「协调」、最终实现和谐共处。

看起来内陆文明更友善和平?也未必。「协调」并不意味着「共存」,而是要改变生存环境。其方案有两种:

1. 融合。打不过,就融合。
2. 消灭。打得过,那就干。

方案2是最快的。如果两个方案都可用,那基本上决策者都会优先考虑方案2,历史上的例子比比皆是(从战争灭族到生物物种灭亡,都是消灭);到了现代文明,碍于舆论的监督与传播,决策者有了更多的忌惮,方案2才被打入冷宫。

「协调」的目的始终朴实无华:

世界太挤了,只有将大家协调一致,才能使彼此都舒服;或者,索性消灭你,这样世界就没那么挤了。

「自由」与「协调」是文明生存的两种方式,并无高下之分。它们也绝非孤立,就像阴与阳始终共存,你中有我、我中有你。只不过海洋文明更偏向「自由」,内陆文明更偏向「协调」。许多东西方文明的矛盾,根源在此。

VI 历史的重演

有了以上的基础理论储备,现在可以开始解释历史的重演了。

历史的重演可分为两类:

1. 社会重演:因人的行为而造就的重演,通常周期在几年到数十年。对于几年内的周期,记为短周期;对于数十年的周期,记为长周期。
2. 自然重演:因自然环境而造就的重演,暂未找到规律。

对于社会重演我们靠记忆来追溯,对于自然重演更多靠历史资料来追溯。展望未来的数十年乃至于数个世纪,历史将可以通过影音图文的形式来追溯,也许22世纪的人会习惯于通过各类公众号研究21世纪的「古人」生活方式。

历史,由无数的事件组成;事件,无不由人来主导。所有的「重演」,都跟我们的做事方法息息相关。

社会重演(短周期):决策者利益最大化的产物

根据「自私的基因」我们知道,任何一件事情的决策者总是会想办法使自己利益最大化,而最稳妥的方式是按照「惯性定律」做决策。

人生长度是未知的,但任职时长却是可知的。在冬天之前离开旧的岗位,在秋天之前抵达新的岗位,跳过损耗与储备阶段,直奔成长与收获阶段,是决策者利益最大化之道。所以,决策者的岗位任期往往会小于或略小于一个短周期。本质上是因为决策者在做决策时,会竭力避免任期内「入冬」。

此类短周期,我们一生中会经历很多,譬如一个城市的建设周期。当你看到好好的路面又被挖开重铺的时候,可能只是因为决策者换人了。

上升,上升!不要停!(图片来源自网络,侵删)

社会重演(长周期):一次击鼓传花的被迫结束

然而,冬天总是会来。于是,决策者会使用「零和博弈」部分提及的两个方法来逃避冬天:向外掠夺与向后掠夺。在实际操作中,两种方法都屡见不鲜。不过,根据「环境反馈定律」,无论怎样掠夺未来都要付出代价。

一切好似击鼓传花,决策者在离场之前,万不可让鼓声停下来。但随着时间的推移,鼓声总是会停,不被任何意志所左右,这是未来的讨债。有始就有终,有起便有落。

这就是我们一生中经历不止一次的长周期。最常见的形式之一便是经济/金融危机。

有涨潮,便有落潮(图片来源自网络,侵删)

自然重演:自然灾害导致的强制清零

于人类而言, 自然始终神秘莫测。既然不可知,也便不在人类的规划之内;对于那些一生都未曾经历的自然灾害,其出现概率可认为是零。如同一只蚂蚱,不需考虑如何过冬。

从古至今,「少数服从多数」都是人类做决策的重要依据;在突发事件的应对上,同样是低概率(少数)让步于高概率(多数)。所以对于那些理论上存在、实际上从未出现过的自然灾害来说,人们总是疏于制定应对方案——应对成本太高,而收益只有当灾害发生时才能体现,不符合决策者及大部分人的利益。

资源是有限的,都投入到未来的话,今天又该怎么过?与其竭尽全力预防未来灾害,不如听天由命过好眼前日子。于是罕见的自然灾害,如大地震、新型传染病总是让人类损失惨重。讽刺的是,正是人们平日的「趋利避害」放大了自然灾害的破坏效果。

自然灾害(图片来源自网络,侵删)

在灾害发生之后,人们就知道改进了吗?不会。既然这些灾害有生之年不会遇到第二次,未来的灾害就留给后人考虑吧。譬如,没有人会想到,SRAS之后的17年,新冠病毒爆发。

受限于知识的匮乏与成本的高昂,人类往往只能对自然灾害进行亡羊补牢。「亡羊」代表着上一个阶段的结束,「补牢」是新一个阶段的开始。2020年,便是亡羊补牢之时;这一次的破坏力与后果,足以载入史册。

VII 文明的交替

有很多观点倾向于将「传染病」类灾害归为人祸而非天灾,理由是决策者的不作为使人们损失惨重。在本文中,其仍然属于自然灾害(天灾),理由有二:

1. 传染病是自然环境对人类的一种反馈,源头始于自然,而非人造。
2. 趋利避害的思维,使人们不会付出巨大的代价去争取未知的收益。灾难只有发生,才能获得人们的重视。

即便是大难临头,苦口婆心的说教依然毫无用处。人是无法被说服的。我们所谓的说服,只不过是通过语言唤醒了对方身体里同意自己的那一部分。那如何让对方身体里,产生「同意自己的那一部分」?通过环境给TA教训,让TA永远记住。所有的身临其境与感同身受,都是因为之前曾处其境、曾遭其受。

个体尚如此,更何况于社会,乃至整个文明体系呢?想不付出惨烈的代价便得到经验,是不可能的。与数百年前的天灾相比,科技进步只是使人类稍微明白了为什么会被自然惩罚,但仍旧无法逃脱惩罚。

在「传染病」面前,不同的「文明属性」所付出的代价大不相同,崇尚「自由」的文明会比重视「协调」的文明更加受创——越强调个体与自由,传染得便越迅速。当然,凡事皆有两面,在创新与探索方面,「自由」的文明会更有优势,这也是西方文明传播得更广,并引导了几次科技革命的原因。只是2020年的天灾,把两类文明推到了交替点上。

文明的重创,并非是种族的消亡,而是精神与信仰的变迁。当「自由」不再被强调的时候,海洋文明的精髓也随之暗淡。一切文明,不过是人类在长期的生存过程中积存下来的社会惯性罢了,终究还是要在生存面前让步。

「自由」的航海时代早已结束,更加「自由」的太空时代远未到来。在这段被限定于地球的日子里,唯有「协调」才能让人们的生存更有安全感。

地球,唯一的家园(图片来源自网络,侵删)

结语

本文包含了许多脑洞级别的构想与推论,然而提出构想总是简单,验证的过程却漫长而艰辛——所以,本着趋利避害的原则,就把验证的机会留给未来的人吧!

以前在教《鸿门宴》课文的时候,我特别花了时间与学生讨论项羽失败的原因。

我这么做的目的在于发散学生的思维,给他们更多作文的素材。

当时,我问全班:秦始皇,刘邦,项羽,他们仨谁是同一辈人?

不出意外,大部分学生认为秦始皇的年龄大刘邦和项羽很多,而刘邦和项羽是同一辈人。

我摇摇头,告诉学生:“这是普遍的历史错觉。”

他们颇为错愕。

我继续解释。

实际上,秦始皇只比刘邦大3岁,而刘邦比项羽大了整整24岁。

换言之,如果秦始皇出生于1965年,那么刘邦则出生于1968年,那么项羽出生于1992年,妥妥的九零后。

我告诉学生,楚汉之争,实际是六零后的刘邦和九零后的项羽争天下的故事。

我进一步引导,让大家联想韩信对项羽的评价:匹夫之勇,妇人之仁。

再让他们结合项羽的年纪思考项羽失败的原因。

学生们你一言我一语地讨论起来,后来不少学生得出结论:“项羽当时太年轻。“

我后来总结说:”我们可以说项羽骄傲自大,逞匹夫之勇,又有妇人之仁。不过我们也没办法苛责,毕竟他那时才20出头,各方面都不成熟。他面对的是成熟的老男人刘邦。

我告诉他们,项羽失败一直有大量的讨论,但从年龄和心理成熟度方面理解,也是一个视角。积累素材,不能图新,而要有自己的思考。作文的核心是思想的展现,而非素材和辞藻的堆砌。

所谓“历史”,它包含有三层意思:人类社会过去的发展过程;对过去的事的记载;人的历史认识。

从第一种解释中,我们知道,历史包括了大至社会形态、国家、民族,小至个人生活的喜怒哀乐的无穷无尽的、各色各样的、此起彼落的事件,事物、事态、事情的形成、发展、转换、变化、结束的过程。这里所说的历史,是一种客观的存在,或者可以叫做“本来的历史”。

既然有“本来的历史”,那就有“非本来的历史”了。这里我们已经注意到了,这个客观存在的“本来的历史”,是已经过去了的东西,历史的东西处在过去的时间段上,时间是不可停止,也不可逆转的。换句话说,对我们来说,那个客观存在过的“本来的历史”已经不再存在了。所以,我们必需也只能依据我们所能接触到的它的“载体”,或者说,经过一种中介来认识它,这就是有关历史的记述及留下来的过去的遗存。

这中间最重要的是文字记载下来的过去的历史,我们可以把它统称为“写的历史”。 这样,我们就有了不是本来的客观存在的历史的“非本来的历史”。

这是“历史”一词的第二种意思。

换句话说,我们是通过别人的眼睛来看过去历史的,是通过别人对历史的认识来认识过去的历史的。这是一种间接的认识,即通过一种载体、中介来认识本来的历史。这样,过去历史的“载体”或认识过去的“中介”,就从“写的历史”或“历史记述”扩大到包括过去遗留的实物和现实生活中的历史的东西,即把记载的“载”,不仅理解为文字的记述,而含有“载体”的意思。 它们都是认识历史的凭借资料,可以说它们都是“史料”。史料不管它在多大程度上反映了真实的、本来的历史,甚至不管它是真是假,它总是一种客观存在,是我们认识历史的凭借。

历史科学的任务是求真,即使我们的历史认识与真实客观的历史一致起来,能反映客观历史的真实,把过去的历史描述出来,使过去的东西重新呈现在人们眼前。但是,过去的东西是无法还原的,历史学写的历史看来象是还原了,实际上只是也只能是过去历史的一个摹本,一个影象。本来的、客观的历史无所谓信与不信,写的历史、所认识的历史则有信与不信之分。信或不信就看所写的是不是与本来的历史相符合。写的历史与本来的历史不是一回事,其间的关系是原本与摹本的区别、是原形与影象的区别。过去的、本来的历史是一个客观存在,写的历史则是主观的认识。写下来的历史也是一个客观存在,但它是历史学家主观认识的客观存在。一切学问都是人类主观对客观的认识,主观的认识总不能和其所认识的客观对象完全符合,一般地说认识充其量也只是相对真理。

这是“历史”的第三层意思。

在我们的斡旋下,沙特和伊朗和解之后,整个世界就像暴风骤雨一样,天天都在发生变化!
绝对是风云激荡!
过去很多年,很多人牛叉无比的人出面,都无法调解好的事,在这短短一个月内,势如破竹地,很多都解决了。
那么,最近又发生了什么事呢?
第一件事是:中东最难解的矛盾,很快就要解开了!
什么矛盾呢?
沙特和也门胡塞武装之间的矛盾!
两家的武装冲突,已经长达8年!
怎么解的呢?
最近有消息说:沙特已经和阿曼代表团一起,去了也门首都萨那,与胡塞武装官员谈判并达成永久停火协议。
胡塞领导人穆罕默德·阿里·胡塞已经会见了沙特代表团团长默罕默德·贾比尔!
沙特和胡塞武装是冲突的两方。
阿曼呢?
是两家的调解人。
在这次会面前,沙特还扎扎实实地,先拿出了诚意:释放了13名胡塞武装方面的囚犯!
到这里,对为啥沙特和胡塞武装之间,是中东最难解的矛盾,可能还不怎么能看出来。
所以得插一下背景。
先从穆斯林的教派说起。
这很多人应该知道的,主要分两派:一派是逊尼派,沙特现在是这派的老大;另一派是什叶派,伊朗是老大。
中东教派地图,注意红圈那块,因为下面会讲到
为啥会形成两派呢?
和我们古代皇帝老了,要怎么选继承人时,遇到的问题有点像。
一派主张“唯贤”,简单来说,就是谁行就谁上,不用讲血缘;
另一派呢?
就主张讲血缘了,觉得穆斯林的领袖,必须得是先知的后人。
“唯贤”这一派,是逊尼派。
主张讲血缘的,就是什叶派。
在这两个大派底下,还可以再分出不少小派来。
明白了这个,再从阿拉伯半岛的地形讲起。
注意到没?
阿拉伯半岛其实挺有意思的:紧贴着红海边,从西北往东南方向,有条很高耸的山脉,其他地方,再缓缓地,从这条山脉往波斯湾方向,倾斜下去。
这条山脉叫赛拉特山脉。
它挺有意思的:越往东南,海拔就越高。
海拔高了,就能拦住空气中的水分,就会出现地形雨,有些地方甚至能到1000毫米,就能长出绿树,开辟出农田来了。
塞拉特山区的梯田
阿拉伯半岛其他地方呢?
除了阿曼一点点地方,其它地方降水量基本上不到100毫米!
就成了沙漠地区。
总之怎么说呢?
沙乌地老家的这句老话是不对的:明知可能死在那儿,可是永远有一片你想穿过的沙漠。
阿拉伯半岛不全是沙漠,还绿意盎然的地方!
那片最绿意盎然的地方,就叫也门!
只要是人,如果不是实在没办法,肯定是不喜欢住沙漠的。
阿拉伯人一样。
所以这片绿意盎然的地方,从古代起,就被半岛其它地方人羡慕地称为“幸福的阿拉伯”。
“也门”这国名啥意思?
就是“幸福”。
差不多100年前,伊本·沙特在建立沙特阿拉伯时,除了传统地盘内志和汉志外,他还沿着红海挥师南下,吃掉了一大片“幸福的阿拉伯”。
虽说不能全部获得幸福,部分幸福,也是好的嘛!
结果就种下了一个远因。
什么事呢?
伊本·沙特吞下的这块“幸福的阿拉伯”,上面住着的,虽说也是阿拉伯人,可不是逊尼派的,而是宰德派的。
这就是上面要大家注意的那个红圈的由来。
这个宰德派,也挺奇怪。
现在很多新闻里都说:它是什叶派的一支。其实呢,在很长时间里,伊朗和伊拉克那帮什叶派,根本没怎么觉得它是同宗!
因为这个远因,随之就出现了近因。
我们都知道,在沙特的沙漠里,发现了非常丰富的石油、天然气,一下子变得很富。
它富了之后,就想着怎么通过钱,越过沙特和也门边境,来推广自家的那一套教义。
宰德派顿时觉得压力山大。
怎么办呢?
老一辈先决定学习一下西方,搞了个真理党,想在选举中获胜。
但这跨度实在太大,每次都铩羽而归。
年轻一辈的呢?
他们走起了下层路线,搞了宗教组织,名字叫“青年信仰者”。
效果不错,挺受欢迎的。
领头的人,是个宗教世家的子弟,名字叫侯赛因·胡塞。
长相挺像吕良伟的。
也门总统萨利赫觉得大势不妙,二话不说,赶紧去镇压。
侯赛因·胡塞呢?
可能文化程度也不怎么高吧,也没自己的什么主张,也可能因为宰德派和伊朗的什叶派,在基本教义上,还有那么一点像,他就借用了伊朗人的口号,臭骂萨利赫亲美、亲以色列。
然后举起大旗,和萨利赫作战。
这位也门版吕良伟比较惨:没打多长时间,就阵亡了。
他爸爸巴达尔丁·胡塞拍案而起,继承了……这里有点乱,他儿子的遗志,领着大家和萨利赫干到底。
任何一支武装,都得打出个旗号来。
哪怕非洲野山沟里的反政府武装,也往往打出个“全国民主联盟”啦什么的时髦旗号了。
这支武装不走寻常路,大家说:为了纪念侯赛因·胡塞,我们就叫“胡塞武装”!
大家都是山里人,讲究的是个实在。
所以那些虚头巴脑的东西,就不搞了。
这支武装实在到什么程度呢?
举个例子:伊朗人一看,咦,怎么在沙特阿拉伯西南边,崛起了这么一支武装啊?
于是赶紧派人,去那里当军事顾问。
于是就有西方记者问胡塞武装的人了:听说伊朗往你们这里派军事顾问了,有没有这回事?
这根本就是个陷阱。
沙特和伊朗矛盾大得很,加上它的开国国王,吞过一大片“幸福的阿拉伯”,上面住着的,可是宰德派啊。
它领土内宰德派住的地方,可就和胡塞武装连在一起啊!
沙特肯定怕波及它嘛!
这么明显的陷阱,胡塞武装的人是怎么回答的呢?
他们说:伊朗人确实派了军事顾问来,但是我们没理他们,他们正在一边晾着呢!
结果好了,一句话得罪两边。
沙特人听到的是:伊朗派了军事顾问!
伊朗人听到的是:我们派的军事顾问,胡塞武装根本就不理!
所以沙特人决定打它。
但这么实诚,也有个好处:大家相处时,事情比较简单。
所以胡塞武装的战斗力,就比较强。
怎么说呢?
别看他们衣衫不整,只是一群穿着拖鞋的部队,但打起仗来,沙特部队不但经常吃亏,而且经常吃大亏。
比如说有次,沙特一个轻型装甲旅被胡塞武装伏击了,其实才被击毁了一辆装甲车,但沙特部队就害怕了,全体弃车逃跑,一个旅的装备,就这么稀里糊涂地,白送给胡塞武装了。
伊朗知道后,顿时不快消除,非常欣喜。
它赶紧偷偷地,各种枪炮、导弹、无人机什么的,不断往胡塞武装那里送。
胡塞武装呢?
也挺会用的,经常创造出奇迹来。
结果呢?
胡塞武装的地盘,不断地扩大。
沙特人和它支持者的地盘,却在不断地缩小,现在已经到了负隅相抗的地步了。
大家相持不下。
沙特人呢,则是骑虎难下。
美国人呢?
则借着保护沙特地盘,不受胡塞武装袭击的名义,进驻了沙特,2500名美军士兵,就住在它首都利雅得附近的基地里!
2018发生卡舒吉事件后,沙特在被美国人骂了个狗血淋头后,为啥不得不掏出1000亿美元,去买美国军火?
它没办法!
远处有伊朗,近处有胡塞武装,家里面呢?
这2500名美国大兵!
结果就是:沙特和胡塞武装鱼蚌相争,美国渔翁得利!
那一笔,驻沙特的美军士兵,人均创收就高达4000万美元!
沙特和胡塞武装的矛盾,既有宗教原因,又有历史原因,还有沙特和伊朗角逐的原因,还有美国的原因,是不是极其复杂?
算不算中东最难解的矛盾?
要不然,美国人也不会那么狮子大张口,搞出人均创收那么高的事来。
说到这里,大家就明白了:沙特和胡塞武装和解,不光是从此大家不必再打仗这么简单,还顺带着消除了美军在沙特驻扎的理由!
今后美军人均创收4000万美元这种事,不会再发生了!
沙特来说,它也能去掉一块心病,不用再担心美军会搞什么肘腋之变了!
再来说第二件事:这两天,巴西、阿根廷这两个南美大国先后:我们要重返南美洲国家联盟!
南美洲国家联盟是个什么东东呢?
要是从纸面上看,规模挺庞大的:
阿根廷、巴西、乌拉圭、巴拉圭、委内瑞拉、玻利维亚、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、秘鲁、智利、圭亚那和苏里南,共有12个,基本涵盖了整个南美洲。
还有两个观察员国:墨西哥和巴拿马。
志向呢?
也挺远大的。
在2004年成立这个联盟之后,大家就嚷嚷了各种美好构想:
我们要搞统一的南美洲市场!
我们要成立统一的南美洲央行,发行统一的货币!
我们还要建立统一的南美洲军队!
光听口号,绝对牛逼克拉斯得一塌糊涂,一副要在美洲和美国分庭抗礼的地步。
于是问题就来了:美国人希望这样的联盟存在吗?
显然不希望嘛!
于是就出事了。
联盟成立后,当时的哥伦比亚,和美国人关系好嘛!
它就先找委内瑞拉的茬,弄得委内瑞拉人非常不高兴;然后再派兵,越境去了厄瓜多尔,搞得厄瓜多尔大怒。
还有一个国家,也和美国关系挺好的。
秘鲁!
当时的玻利维亚总统是莫拉莱斯,秘鲁人说他有句话说错了,宣布召回大使。
两家又闹了一场。
之后,反正时不时地,就有国家跳出来,找个小茬子,和其他国家吵一架。
为啥会这样?
背后有美国嘛!
然后到了2018年,当时南美洲政坛的右翼,也就是亲美的那批人回潮了,在那一年,巴西、阿根廷、智利、哥伦比亚、巴拉圭和秘鲁6国就宣布暂停参加南美洲国家联盟。
这个联盟就名存实亡了。
因为面积大一点、人口多一点的国家,差不多全跑了!
巴西和阿根廷,可是南美洲大国啊!
它们的重返,意味着:那个当年让美国头痛无比,好不容易才拆散的联盟,又回来了!
所以这又是一大变!
说到这里,不知道大家发现没有:从3月10日中沙伊联合声明到今天,才差不多整一个月,但就在这一个月之中,发生了很多事吧!
整个世界的格局都因此发生很大变化了,为啥这些事,会突如其来地,统统都发生了呢?
简单来说,就是时候到了。
这短短的一个月,和我们2000多年前,春秋时晋国发生的一件往事很像。
什么事呢?
三家灭智!
春秋后期,整个晋国被四家把持住了。
最强大的一家,是智氏。
它的当家人是智伯,历史记载里说,此人很牛叉,身材高大,相貌堂堂;武艺高强,擅长射箭和驾车;不但会武,还能文,此人说起话来巧言善辩,文辞优美;他的性格呢,也是坚强刚毅,果断勇敢。
怎么来形容呢?
绝对的六边形人才。
智氏最强大,当家人又最能干,就有小弟跟随。
一个是魏氏,一个是韩氏。
都属于四家。
四家之中,只有一家不服智氏。
赵氏!
三比一,那是必赢的仗啊。
所以智伯觉得自己一定会赢,对魏、韩两家,也不怎么客气,他就向这两家要土地。
这两家呢?
也都怕智氏,就都把好地割给他了。
但心里面呢?
肯定是极其不爽的嘛!

智伯拿到两家的地后,就更狂妄了,又派人,跑去找赵氏要地。
见赵氏不从,智伯大怒,叫上魏、韩两家,去打赵家。那两家怕他,就出动军队,跟着一起去打了。
赵氏一家,那打得过三家?
只能死守晋阳城。
智伯呢?
他聪明得很,见攻城很难,就掘开汾河大堤,引汾河水灌城。
城市很快被淹了,人们纷纷挤在城墙上。
当时的城墙,是用土垒成的,如果长期被水泡,很容易崩掉。
智伯让魏家的当家人为他驾车,韩家的当家人给他当护卫,一边看着水势,一边得意洋洋地说:现如今,我才知道,原来用水,也可以灭人家的国啊!
魏、韩两家的当家人,顿时变了脸色。
因为他们两家的都城,和赵氏一样,也都建在大河边上啊!
正好在这时,赵氏派人来联系,直截了当地说:赵氏的今天,就是你们的明天!如果赵氏灭了,接下来就轮到你们两家了!
魏、韩一咬牙,决定和赵氏结盟。
当天,三家一起动手,对智氏的军队发起进攻,最后除去了智氏,那个六边形人才、牛逼克拉斯的智伯,也死在赵氏手里。
看到这里,是不是觉得:拜登其实和智伯挺像的?
他最初,手头也有一堆小弟,比如说欧洲,比如说日韩。
拜登下起手来,和智伯一样,也挺狠的。
比如说,他通过拱火,让俄乌发生战争,使欧洲各国不得不唯美国马首是瞻;
战争让俄罗斯的天然气难进入欧洲,美国再卖给欧洲高价气;
美国还乘着欧洲能源紧张,吸引很多欧洲企业进入了美国!
所以我们一直说他是胸有成竹,有条不紊。
这不是贬他,是说他确实有几把刷子的。
既然这么牛叉,为啥这两年,美国处处不顺呢?
因为美国也犯了和智伯一样的错误:像对我们发动科技战,在芯片上卡我们的脖子;像疯狂制裁俄罗斯,没收俄罗斯的海外财产,还把它踢出swift系统。
这就类似智伯引汾河水,去灌赵氏的晋阳城。
世界上的绝大多数国家,都被它这一手搞怕了!
因为今天,美国可以用这手,来对付俄罗斯和我们,明天呢,它如果看谁不顺眼,难道不会用这几手,去对付别的国家吗?
那怎么办?
既然美国威胁这么大,那大家如果能和解的,就要赶紧和解;能抱团的,就赶紧要抓紧抱团;能在国际贸易中去美元的,当然要赶紧去美元啦!
在总的面上,把大家都搞怕了,美国怎么还可能顺呢?
这种大背景下干任何事,当然都会搞砸啦!
所以当我们反击一开始,在这短短一个月之内,整个世界其实已经形势大变。
我们之前讲过:搞政治搞外交,最关键的是要让自己成为各方利益的交汇点,一旦你处在这个交汇点的位置,那就事事顺遂,天地为你开合,风云为你变色。要是离开了呢,那怕你国力再强,部队再多,也会最终失败。
拜登上台后,他所做的事,就是让美国离开了这个交汇点。
为啥最近一个月,但我们一展开反击,拜登的整个布局,就如土崩瓦解般的,到处都是破洞?背后就是这个原因!
真是:机关算尽太聪明,反误了卿卿性命!

中国古代四大贤母

一、孟母

孟母是战国孟子之母,位居“四大贤母”之首。她的儿子孟子是中国古代著名的思想家、教育家,是仅次于孔子的儒学大家,被誉为“亚圣”。孟母之所以能培养出如此优秀的儿子,全在于她对子女的悉心教育。她最被广为传颂的事迹是“孟母三迁”的故事。

孟母早年丧夫,却志不改嫁,一个人含辛茹苦养育孟子。刚开始她和孟子住在丈夫的陵墓附近,以便于每天可以去祭拜丈夫。只是在这种地方住久了,年幼的孟子竟学起了出殡人士的哭丧胡闹。孟母觉得这样的居住环境不利于孩子成长,便把家搬到了集市。可是把家搬到集市后,孟子却学着小贩商人们做起了吆喝买卖。孟母不希望自己儿子将来成为市井小人,所以又把家搬到了学校附近。从此后,孟子就跟着学校里的士子,学起了“好好读书,天天向上”。孟母之所以三迁,是因为她深谙一个道理:“环境会影响一个人的成长。”

孟母还有“子不学、断机杼”的故事,她教育孟子,学业若半途而废,就如织到一半的布匹,是不能为人所用的。同样,人若在年少时不好好读书,长大了便只能做些苦命的劳役,是没有出息的。从此孟子发奋读书,终成为一代旷世学儒。

二、陶母

陶母是东晋陶侃之母。陶侃是一代名将,在稳定东晋初年动荡不安的政局上,很有建树。而当时陶母“截发筵宾”、“封坛退鲊”的教子故事也广为流传。

陶侃幼为孤子,家境贫寒。陶母也是早年丧夫,她含辛茹苦,靠纺纱织麻维持生计,供养陶侃读书。在教子上,陶母一直教育儿子,交朋友一定要交比自己更有水平、更有文化之人。

有一次,同郡孝廉(即举人)范逵访贤遇大雪,借宿陶侃家。时天寒地冻,马无饲料,陶母揭去自己床铺上的稻草席,剁碎喂马;由于家中贫寒,无以款客,陶母又偷偷剪下自己的长发,卖给邻人,换钱购买酒菜。在中国人的观念中,“身体发肤,受之父母,不敢毁伤,孝至始也”,所以头发是不可以轻易剪的。陶母如此举动,足见她待客之诚心。所以范逵大为感动,遂举荐陶侃由县吏拜授郎中,从此后,陶侃走上了发达的仕途。这就是“截发筵宾”的典故。

陶母还有一个广为传颂的故事是“封坛退鲊”。 陶侃曾在浙江海阳做县吏,监管渔业,常有下属送东西给他。有一次,一位下属送了一坛鱼鲊(腌鱼)给陶侃,孝顺的陶侃马上念及一生贫居乡间的慈母,便嘱托乡人带给母亲。谁知母亲却原封不动地将这一坛鱼鲊退了回来,并在信中写道:“尔为吏,以官物遗我,非惟不能益吾,乃以增吾忧矣。”(《晋书》卷九十六《陶侃母湛氏传》)

陶侃收到母亲退回的鱼鲊和回信,大为震动,更愧疚万分。他下定决心,一生遵循母亲教导:清白做人,廉洁为官。

后人赞誉:“世之为母者如湛氏之能教其子,则国何患无人材之用?而天下之用恶有不理哉?”(明·张九韶《重修陶母基记》;康熙《新淦县志》卷十四《艺文志·记》)

三、欧母

欧母是北宋欧阳修之母。欧阳修是北宋卓越的政治家、文学家、史学家,但他的成就也离不开他母亲的伟大教育。

欧母又是一位单亲母亲,她丈夫在儿子四岁那年便去逝了,留下她孤身一人辛苦拉扯儿子。欧阳修父亲在世时,家中经济比较宽裕,可自从他去世后,家境便一落千丈,日渐贫寒。后来竟到了“房无一间,地无一垄”的地步。孤儿寡母在这样的境况下生活,困难是可想而知的。

欧母是一个意志坚强的女人,她家穷志不穷,靠自己的辛勤劳动,将儿子养大,并用最原始的方式教欧阳修识字--这便是著名的“画荻教子”:欧阳修五岁时,欧母便教他读书识字、做人处事的道理。只是当时家里穷,家里没钱买笔墨纸砚,欧母只好用芦苇杆代替,然后在地上铺一些沙,把地当纸,一笔一画地教欧阳修写字。

穷人家的孩子早当家,欧阳修在母亲的悉心教导下,特别懂事,于是奋发图强,学习成绩优异,他于仁宗天圣八年(公元1030年)高中进士。

欧阳修在当官期间,积极支持范仲淹维持新法,后因此被贬职。但欧母并没有抱怨儿子的仕途不济,而是宽慰儿子说:“你为正义被贬职,不能说不光彩。我们家过惯了贫寒的生活,你只要思想上没有负担,精神不衰,我就高兴。"有母如此,儿子焉能不伟大?

四、岳母

岳母是北宋名将岳飞之母。岳飞十五六岁时,北方的金人南侵,宋朝当权者腐败无能,节节败退,国家处在生死存亡的关头。很多自私的母亲都不希望自己的孩子上前线,希望能在战乱年代保全子嗣血脉。但是岳母却和一般母亲不同,她大义凛然,主动励子从戎,精忠报国。她为了让儿子永远铭记大丈夫当“精忠报国”的训诫,甚至用绣花针把这四个字刺在岳飞的背上!

由于岳母的积极鼓励,使得岳飞投军后,奋勇杀敌、义无反顾,他很快屡建战功被升为秉义郎。有一次宋都开封被金军围困时,岳飞随副元帅宗泽前去救援,多次打败金军,受到宗泽的赏识,称赞他是"智勇才艺,古良将不能过"。

后来岳飞终成为一代有名的抗金英雄,为历代人民所敬仰。

这就是中国古代的“四大贤母”,她们教子的故事,充分说明了母教的重要及伟大。

评论

此博客中的热门博文

The Ultimate Tool Stack for AI Agents

弦线驻波