Taiwan's lessons should not be repeated on the mainland台湾的教训不要在大陆重演
Taiwan's lessons should not be repeated on the mainland
1
Why did Taiwan become what it is today? 90% of it is not unified.
Why Anti-China Favoring Japan?
Even most Taiwanese do not recognize themselves as Chinese.
In an ideological war, the flames cannot be seen and the smoke cannot be smelled.
But in the end, you will see the consequences.
It's just that when you see the consequences, it's often too late.
2
The United States' ideological battle against Taiwan is almost 100 points.
And now, I see a similar pattern on the mainland.
You must know that multinational companies will try to launch products in Taiwan before entering the mainland market.
Because Taiwan is the Chinese market that is most similar to the whole mainland China.
3
Therefore, according to the reaction of the Taiwan market, it is roughly known that the mainland market is not successful?
I think it will be a big hit. According to the actual operation in Taiwan, I will correct omissions and improve the model.
It will further increase sales.
4
Therefore, when the United States wants to attack the Chinese fortress, disintegrate China, and "peacefully evolve" China.
Taiwan experience is too important.
The United States has already sorted out its actual combat experience in ideological warfare in Taiwan over the past few decades.
A complete Taiwan model was built.
Also gradually imported to the mainland.
5
The importance of the Taiwan model is because Taiwan has too strong a connection with mainland China in terms of nationality, culture, and politics.
Imported to the mainland, not only can copy the Taiwan model.
Moreover, after conquering Taiwan, Taiwan's culture, media, education, and economy and trade can be used to deeply, profoundly, and generally affect mainland China.
6
So, let's sort it out carefully and see how the United States has waged ideological wars in Taiwan for a long time.
How to evolve Taiwan step by step is very important.
Especially, now in the mainland, I see the same operation again and again.
Not unserious.
7
When the United States was operating in Taiwan, of course Japan was not idle.
The first step is to master the textbook.
Starting from elementary school textbooks, we will pull Taiwan out of China step by step.
Using "localization" and "localization" as an excuse to magnify Taiwan and "Taiwanism only".
Why do we need to understand the Yellow River and Yangtze River?
We should understand Danshui River and Zhuoshui River.
Say "Taiwanese should love Taiwan".
As a result, Chinese history, geography, and national consciousness were quickly pulled out of textbooks.
8
Europe and the United States have the right to speak in global academics.
Therefore, not only science and engineering, but all social sciences and humanities must use European and American theories and publish papers in European and American journals.
So, may I ask, who can submissively obey the right to speak in the United States?
9
Taiwanese media are not capable of international reporting.
Therefore, BBC, CNN, Reuters, Agence France-Presse, and NHK are sources of international news in Taiwan.
What the journalism department studies is also the communication theory established by others.
The United States has also vigorously interfered in Taiwan's media.
Before the general election in Taiwan, it was hard for everyone to imagine how deep the United States was involved in Taiwan's media.
And "Night Questions Fighting Power", as Taiwan, is the only program that tells the truth from an independent point of view.
Just before the 2020 general election, it was pressured to take it off the shelves.
Apart from "Night Questions on Fighting Power", Taiwan no longer has any programs based on the Chinese standpoint.
10
Taiwan's network is the home of the United States.
Therefore, the ideological war on the Internet has made Taiwanese people very clear about what can be said and what cannot be said.
What speech will be suppressed and what speech will be encouraged.
11
The United States and Japan will look for candidates in universities, use NGOs and various foundations, and bind young people early.
Whether it is applying for schools, scholarships, or publishing papers in the future.
You both need to have US connections.
Therefore, in all walks of life in Taiwan, you can hardly find people who are not pro-American.
Japan is also very wary of any anti-Japanese rhetoric.
It will also foster pro-Japanese forces in academia.
12
Japan controls and the United States controls Taiwan's economy, plus a large number of American and Japanese businessmen, as well as communities of interests in Taiwan.
The result is that if you are not pro-American and not pro-Japanese, you will be unable to move an inch in all walks of life in Taiwan.
If you are close to the United States and Japan, it will be like a godsend.
This is especially true in the entertainment and cultural circles.
13
Any voice in Taiwan that is friendly to the mainland will become weaker and weaker.
Don't say it's orthodox.
Blue also turns light blue and then light green.
This is the law.
Use Taiwan's public opinion to "counterattack the mainland" and evolve the mainland.
This is the American playbook.
The Taiwan issue is an issue between China and the United States. It can even be said to be a problem with Western countries. The resolution of the Taiwan issue means that the West will withdraw from East Asia, and China will become the hegemon in East Asia. Russia’s self-protection also benefits from its having an atomic bomb. If Russia does not have an atomic bomb, Putin will be Saddam’s end
For example, some countries have given up the US dollar. As long as those countries are still in the Western system, they can use elections to change parties in the future and become a party that embraces the West again. If it really doesn't work, you can also give him a color revolution, so that the internal leading party should cooperate with the outside.
This is a historic opportunity that only existed in 200 years. If it is enlarged to 500 years, it is also possible. This is a historic strategic rebalancing strategy between the East and the West. .
hehe.
The U.S. currency hegemony, democracy, freedom and human rights are gone, and it is said that the U.S. has no losses? ! The U.S. lost the most in this war, none of them. China's life is better, and the opportunity is right in front of us. The Russo-Ukrainian War is the best historical and strategic opportunity to change China's destiny.
This depends on the depth and breadth of its involvement. If the United States does not work hard, it will lose the whole of Europe. At present, the largest investment is the United States, followed by the European Union. If we simply regard him as a conflict between Russia and Ukraine, this is an absolutely wrong view. Ukraine is just a war pawn of the NATO bloc. Ukraine is too small, and it would have collapsed without the support of the NATO group.
The United States is far more floating than Russia. Otherwise, it will not fight against Russia with the US currency hegemony, democracy, freedom and human rights. The loss of the United States is much greater than that of Russia.
We need to use Russia's war resources and potential to maximize the consumption of the entire NATO bloc. Let Russia and NATO consume each other, and China will reap the benefits of the fisherman. When both sides are exhausted is when China really rises, it is a matter of trade-off strategy. This is China's core interest, the best interest. What China has to do is to maintain the strategic balance between the warring parties as much as possible, so that the two sides will fall into a long-term war of attrition and a protracted war. I don't know if Beijing's decision-making elites, accustomed to pacifism, really realize this.
Generally speaking, it is impossible for Western countries to have more casualties than the Volunteers in the entire war. The Korean Army is giving away heads, which basically equalizes the casualty ratio between the Volunteers and the United Nations. Condition. For example, in the Battle of Shangganling, the casualties of the U.S. Army were nearly double that of the Volunteers.
But it is impossible for NATO to win this proxy war against Russia. This is a basic judgment of mine. In fact, it has been clearly seen from the wars in Afghanistan and Syria. In particular, the war in Afghanistan is very representative. NATO equipment and NATO-trained troops collapsed overnight. The Taliban is only a guerrilla-level military organization.
The so-called peace of Western countries is a hypocrite. Of course, the current situation in China is that of the landlords in "Praying for Rain". Regardless of peace or war, China is one of the biggest beneficiaries. Because of the trade in peacetime, they are not as profitable as China. So China doesn't care about the Russia-Ukraine war and the war with China at all.
The Russian army made many mistakes during the Russo-Ukraine War, some even strategic mistakes. It is mainly manifested in the first stage of thinking of underestimating the enemy, lack of national mobilization, lack of ideological preparation for the depth and breadth of NATO's involvement, lack of ideological preparation for the depth and intensity of Western sanctions, lack of judgment on the cruelty of war, and lack of tenacious resistance to the Ukrainian army. mental preparation. Judging from the combat effectiveness of the Wagner Group and the regular Russian army, there are also many problems within the Russian army.
In the Korean War, the casualty ratio of the Volunteers to the U.S. Army was 3:1, and the casualty ratio to the entire United Nations Army was only 1.1 to 1, because the troops from South Korea and other countries in the United Nations Army basically came to send heads. But in Bakhmut, the casualty ratio of the Ukrainian army to the Russian army was at least 7 to 1. NATO publicly stated that it was 7 to 1, and some Western institutions and senior Ukrainian officials believed it was 10 to 1.
A large number of troops and equipment of the Ukrainian army were wasted and damaged in Bakhmut, and the casualties were extremely high, more than twice the casualty ratio of the Korean War volunteers to the US military. Recently, the G7 has openly kidnapped China politically and openly asked China to put pressure on Russia to negotiate in accordance with the logic of Ukraine and NATO. This is openly provoking Sino-Russian relations. China does not have such political influence on Russia, and even if it did, it would not be able to do so. This is a war between NATO and Russia. What does it have to do with China? Now six African countries have been introduced to act as mediators. I think it's quite funny, when will it be the African black brothers' turn to talk about major events in this world?
Bakhmut was of no value in february because all the places supported by the bakhmut hub traffic lines were lost, only one eight hemut salient remained and at that time bakhmut was mostly captured and russian occupation With the favorable terrain around, the meat grinder operation against the Ukrainian army has already begun. Therefore, NATO suggested that the driver withdraw Buffett Mutt's troops, abandon Bakhmutt, and concentrate his forces to launch a counterattack in the direction of Zaporozhye. Driver, this political amateur can't understand, he is stubborn, he stuffs a large number of troops and equipment into it, right in the arms of the Russian army, it seems that Bachmut has a taste of Wuhan, China. Perhaps it is also the strategic position of Xuzhou, so the international media is particularly concerned.
Why openly lie?
Because the attention of international public opinion on this battle is too high, it is the cruelest battle since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and it is called a meat grinder. On the one hand, the defeat of the Ukrainian army is related to the morale of the people and the military in Ukraine, and on the other hand, it is related to the face of NATO. It is also related to the political support of voters in NATO countries for military aid to Ukraine. Therefore, the Ukrainian military and NATO media must lie openly, otherwise the game will be difficult to continue. Biden advocated in Japan to provide fighters for the Ukrainian army. The meaning is obvious, continue to increase the chips of the game. The NATO group has temporarily fallen into a politically difficult situation, because this is a proxy war between the entire NATO group and Russia, and they really cannot afford to lose such a war.
NATO is the clearest about whether Bahemut is lost. NATO clearly stated that the city of Bahemut has been lost, and the fighting in the Bahemut area is still going on.
Who is lying about the Russian army's capture of Bakhmut?
Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Russian media are saying that the Russian army has conquered Bahmut. This means that the Russian army has fully occupied Bahmut. The Ukrainian army was defeated in this cruelest battle. It is said that the Ukrainian army was in Bach 19 brigades of about 200,000 troops were successively invested in the Muter battlefield. And they are all the main forces, and the NATO troops also have key defenses here.
Zelensky admitted to the media that the Ukrainian army had lost Bakhmut. Now the deputy commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army has denied the claims of Russia and Zelensky, saying that the Ukrainian army still partially controls Bakhmut and has formed a semi-encirclement situation against the Russian army. So who is lying? Undoubtedly the Ukrainians. Frontline war reporters are very aware of the situation on the battlefield.
It's purely for data comparison, don't make any unnecessary associations, all the information comes from the Internet that can be seen inside the wall.
Area comparison
Use the equal-area projection map, under the same scale, directly put the two together. Old map with Crimea in it.
The area data comes from Baidu Encyclopedia. I don’t know why the area of Ukraine given by Baidu is larger than that given by foreign English websites, and I didn’t check whether the area includes the Crimea Peninsula, but overall the difference is not too much , without affecting the comparison.
The area of Ukraine is 16.76 times that of Taiwan.
By the way, the area of the Crimea Peninsula is about 26,000 square kilometers, which is 10,000 square kilometers smaller than Taiwan. It is said that Russia only dispatched 200 people to take Crimea.
2021, Population Comparison
Taiwan: 23.375 million
Ukraine: 43.923 million,
Taiwan's population is about half that of Ukraine's.
US military base comparison
I have indicated the location of Ukraine with yellow arrows and red circles, blue areas are NATO, dark dots are US military bases.
Linguistically, the map is probably from Russia. From the perspective of motivation, there is no need for Da Mao to conceal or lie about the US military base, because it is related to his own deployment of troops. Moreover, if Da Mao's label is wrong, it is very likely to give the American media an excuse to say that Da Mao is a fake.
Counting the US military bases in Alaska and New Zealand, the situation on the Asia-Pacific side is shown in the picture above.
I won't count the exact number, but the biggest difference is that there is NATO and its headquarters. Here, at least the U.S. troops stationed in South Korea dare not move around, because San Fatty is in the north, and South Korea's military power is empty, so it is difficult to guarantee that North Korea has no ideas. Moreover, now Sanpang's balls are getting stronger and stronger.
Terrain comparison
The side of Ukraine near Russia is more plains, and the west side is mountainous.
The side of Taiwan close to the motherland is a shallow sea and a plain, and there are more cities, population and various infrastructures on this side. The central and eastern parts of Taiwan (the Pacific side) are more mountainous.
Imagine, when amphibious landing, is it better to be a plain after landing, or is it better to have mountains on the shore and the other side is condescending?
airport comparison
Attached is a comparison of the strengths of Russia and Ukraine before the start of the war. Note that before the start of the war, after the start of the war, only the upper villains are left on the Ukrainian side, and the lower ones have been dealt with.
纯粹是做一下数据比较，不要做任何不必要的联想，所有资料均来自墙内可以看到的互联网。
面积对比
使用等积投影地图，同比例尺下，直接把他俩凑一起。老地图，里面还有克里米亚。
面积数据来自百度百科，不知道为什么百度给的乌克兰面积比国外英文网站上给的还要大，而且我也没去求证这个面积是不是包括了克里米亚半岛，不过总体上差不太多，不影响对比。
乌克兰面积是台湾的16.76倍。
顺便说一下，克里米亚半岛面积是大概是2.6万平方公里，比台湾小了1万平方公里，传说当初俄罗斯拿下克里米亚只出动了200人。
2021年，人口对比
- 台湾：2337.5万
- 乌克兰：4392.3万、
台湾人口大概是乌克兰的一半。
美军基地对比
我用黄色箭头和红圈指出了乌克兰的位置，蓝色区域是北约，深色的点是美军基地。
从语言上看，地图八成是来自俄罗斯。从动机上看，大毛对于美军基地没必要隐瞒或撒谎，因为这关系到他自己的兵力部署。而且，如果大毛标错了，很有可能给美国媒体口实，说大毛造假。
把远在阿拉斯加和新西兰的美军基地都算上，亚太这边的情况见上图。
具体数量我就不数了，最大的区别是那边有北约，是有总部的。这边的话，至少驻韩美军不敢乱动，因为三胖在北边呢，韩国军力空虚了，难保朝鲜没有想法。而且，现在三胖的蛋蛋越来越厉害了。
地形对比
乌克兰靠近俄罗斯一侧更多的是平原，西边是山地。
台湾靠近祖国这一侧是浅海，是平原，城市、人口和各种基础设施也更多的在这一侧。台湾的中部和东部（太平洋那边）更多的是山区。
想像一下，两栖登陆的时候，上岸后是平原好，还是岸边就是山，对方居高临下的情况好？
机场对比
再附一张俄乌开战前的实力对比，注意，是开战前，开战后乌克兰那边的战斗力量就只剩上面的小人了，下面的都被搞定了。
台湾的教训不要在大陆重演
1
台湾为什么变成今天，90%不统一。
为什么反中媚日?
甚至多数台湾人，不承认自己是中国人。
意识形态的战争，是看不见火光，闻不到烟硝味的。
但是最终，你会看到后果。
只是当你看到后果，常常已经来不及了。
2
美国对台湾的意识形态作战，几乎是100分。
而现在，我在大陆看到类似的模式。
要知道跨国企业，在进入大陆市场前，都会在台湾试推产品。
因为台湾是跟整个中国大陆最像的华人市场。
3
所以，根据台湾市场的反应，就大概，知道大陆市场中不中?
认为会大卖的，根据台湾的实操，修正疏漏，改良模型。
更会让销量更上一层楼。
4
所以，当美国要攻进中国堡垒，要瓦解中国，要“和平演变”中国时。
台湾经验，就太重要了。
美国早已经整理了，几十年来在台湾的意识形态战的实战经验。
建立了一个完整的台湾模型。
也逐步输入到大陆。
5
台湾模型的重要性，是因为台湾在民族、文化、政治等跟中国大陆有太强的连结性。
输入大陆，不但可以照搬台湾模型。
而且攻下台湾之后，更可以利用台湾的文化、媒体、教育与经贸，深入地、深刻地、普遍地影响中国大陆。
6
所以，仔细梳理，看看美国是怎么在台湾，长期进行意识形态战争的。
怎么一步步让台湾演变的，就很重要。
尤其是，如今在大陆，我一再看到了同样的操作。
不是不严重的。
7
美国在台湾操作时，当然日本也没有闲着。
第一步是掌握教科书。
从小学教科书开始，一步步把台湾从中国拉出去。
以“本土化”，“在地化”做借口，放大台湾，“唯台湾主义”。
说我们为什么要了解黄河长江?
我们应该了解淡水河、浊水溪。
说“台湾人要爱台湾”。
于是，中国历史、地理，民族意识，快速被从教科书拉掉。
8
欧美有全球学术话语权。
于是，不只是理工科，所有社会学科跟人文学科，都要使用欧美理论，发表论文在欧美期刊。
那么，请问，谁能不屁颠屁颠地服膺在美国的话语权下?
9
台湾媒体没有能力做国际报导。
所以，BBC、CNN、路透社、法新社、NHK是台湾国际新闻的来源。
新闻科系读的，也是别人建立的传播理论。
美国又大力干预台湾媒体。
台湾大选前，美国对台湾媒体的介入之深，大家很难想象。
而“夜问打权”，作为台湾，独一无二有独立观点讲述事实的节目。
就在2020大选前，被施压下架。
而“夜问打权”之外，台湾不再有任何一个以中国人立场立足的节目。
10
台湾网络是美国主场。
所以，网络上的意识形态战争，让台湾人很清楚，什么可以说，什么不能说。
什么言论会被打压，什么言论会被鼓励。
11
美国跟日本会在大学寻找人选，利用NGO跟各种基金会，早期绑定年轻人。
不管是申请学校、奖学金，将来的论文发表。
你都需要有美国关系。
所以，台湾各行各业，你几乎找不到不亲美的人。
日本对任何反日的言论也非常警惕。
也会在学术界培植亲日的势力。
12
日本控跟美国对台湾经济的控制力，加上大量美商、日商，以及在台湾的利益共同体。
结果就是，你如果不亲美、不亲日，你就在台湾各行各业都寸步难行。
你如果亲美、亲日，就有如神助。
演艺圈跟文化圈更是如此。
13
台湾任何对大陆友善的声音，都会越来越弱。
不要说是统派了。
蓝也会变浅蓝，然后变浅绿。
这是定律。
利用台湾舆论，再“反攻大陆”，演变大陆。
这就是美国的剧本。
评论
发表评论