Dismember China肢解中国

　　From an abridged text

Evelyn Rawski, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh in the United States, "Revisiting the Qing Dynasty-On the Significance of the Qing Dynasty in Chinese History" (referred to as "Revisiting the Qing Dynasty") is regarded as the flagship work of "New Qing History". Published in 1996, this article systematically expressed the representative views of "New Qing History". Two years later, Chinese scholar He Bingdi responded fiercely with his article "Defending Sinicization-Refuting Luo Youzhi's "Revisiting the Qing Dynasty". Since then, "New Qing History" has become a hot topic in Chinese historiography at home and abroad, and it has not stopped until now. In view of this, when the author participated in the editing of "National Identity of the Qing Dynasty——"New Qing History" Research and Controversy", the Chinese translation of this article was included as the first article. But for various reasons, section 4 "Qing History and Chinese Nationalism" (Qing History and Chinese Nationalism) was deleted at that time.

In the following 10 years, some scholars continued to raise objections to this method of deleting the original text. They believed that deleting the fourth section of the article would not only fail to fully reflect Luo Youzhi’s academic views, but also prevent the majority of domestic readers from understanding Luo Youzhi’s academic achievements. Extra care.

Section 4 of Luo Youzhi's "Revisiting the Qing Dynasty" is entitled "Qing History and Chinese Nationalism". The policy pressure of sinicization and elimination of non-Han ethnic characteristics has led to the rise of nationalism and the development of political centrifugal tendencies in Mongolia, Tibet, and Xinjiang since the Republic of China. The "independence" of Mongolia and Tibet is in line with legal principles. These fallacies underscore the author's political purpose beyond academic research.

Ignorant of historical facts or ulterior motives?

Luo Youzhi ignores the continuity of the unified multi-ethnic state from the Qing Dynasty, the Republic of China to the People's Republic of China.

"Picture of Emperor Yongzheng's Pleasures · Daoist Image"

"The Qing Dynasty is not equal to China" is an important point of view of "New Qing History", and "Revisiting the Qing Dynasty" played a key role in condensing this point of view. Luo Youzhi’s interpretation of the historical transition from the Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China adhered to a wrong cognition from the beginning: China refers to the area of Han people’s activities—the inland, and the border areas do not belong to the Han people, so they do not belong to China. Therefore, she pointed out, “From the beginning of its establishment, the Republic of China has faced the fundamental contradiction of insisting on Han nationalism and eager to retain the entire territory of the Qing Dynasty in a nation-state.” The reason for this contradiction is that "the Revolution of 1911 liberated the Manchus, Mongols, Uyghurs and Tibetans from the shackles of the Qing Empire and gave them the possibility to establish their own nation-state. Loyalty to the Qing Empire is not Equivalent to loyalty to the newly formed Republic of China".

The core question involved in the above discussion is whether there is historical continuity from the Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China, and whether sovereignty remains unified?

The outbreak of the Revolution of 1911 did trigger people in various inland provinces, Mongolia, Tibet, Xinjiang and other places to think about China's future direction, and "getting rid of Qing independence" once became a political trend. However, this kind of "independence" is not independence in the sense of national sovereignty, but "independence" relative to the rule of the Qing court, and with the establishment of the Republic of China, the political order that recognized the Republic of China was quickly restored.

At the end of 1911, when Outer Mongolia announced its "independence", it said, "The current situation is the great chaos in the south, the independence of the provinces, the power of the Qing emperor, and the change of the national system. It is caused by immorality." It can be seen from this that, like the southern provinces, Outer Mongolia opposed the "immoral" rule of the Qing government and hoped for "changes in the state system" rather than a unified multi-ethnic country from outside. Therefore, shortly after the founding of the Republic of China, Outer Mongolia publicly declared that it was still part of Chinese territory.

In addition, in the face of the so-called "independence" of the Mongolian and Tibetan areas after the Revolution of 1911, the government of the early Republic of China made a lot of political adjustments to ensure the unity of the country. For example, the "Regulations on Treatment of Mongolian and Tibetans" when the Qing emperor abdicated was recognized, and the interests of upper-class people in Mongolia, Tibet, and Xinjiang were protected by means of persuasion, canonization, and generous benefits; the main content of the "Regulations on Treatment of Mongolian and Tibetans" Listed as Articles 64 and 65 of the "Convention Law of the Republic of China", guaranteeing that "the conditions announced on February 12, the first year of the Republic of China... the conditions for the treatment of the Manchu, Mongolian, Hui, and Tibetan ethnic groups will never change its effectiveness ". At the same time, ensure that Mongolia, Tibet, Xinjiang and other places have their own seats in the Congress. Therefore, although the regime changed and the “state system changed” in the early days of the Republic of China, the institutional framework of a unified multi-ethnic country did not change, nor did the unified sovereign state. Political space and status.

Fundamentally speaking, the regime change in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China was an internal affair of a country, and it did not affect the centripetal force of the people in the frontier towards the new regime, nor did it weaken the effective jurisdiction of the Republic of China government over the border areas. The legitimacy of the rule of border areas.

Any qualified historian should maintain a basic understanding of historical continuity when making judgments on such important historical issues. Luo Youzhi deliberately severed the internal connection from the Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China, and ignored the positive measures taken by the early Republic of China government to maintain a unified multi-ethnic country. This approach is either ignorant of historical facts or has ulterior motives.

Who is tearing apart China's borders?

Luo Youzhi arbitrarily judged: In the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, Han merchants entered Mongolia, Tibet and other border areas, which aroused strong opposition from the local people. It was the "aggressiveness" of the Han people that led to China's crisis of division. But she did not mention anything about the wanton interference of Western countries such as Britain and Russia in Mongolia, Tibet and other places.

Existing studies have shown that it was Britain and Russia that tried to split China's border areas by taking advantage of the tendency of Mongolia and Tibet in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China to "break away from the Qing Dynasty and become independent". For example, in 1912, the troops from Sichuan and Yunnan provinces of the Republic of China government entered Tibet, recovered the Xikang area, and planned to march into Lhasa, but they stopped due to British pressure. The later Simla Conference also formed a so-called "agreement" that interfered with China's exercise of sovereignty over Tibet for a long time. Therefore, it can be seen that the biggest obstacle to maintaining the unity of the multi-ethnic country in modern China was neither the contradiction between Han people and non-Han people, nor the issue of ethnic identity or nationalism, but the intervention of British, Russian and other big powers.

Luo Youzhi turned a blind eye to this, and even beautified the British, Russian and other powers who encouraged "Mongol and Tibetan independence" as "saviors." In order to make his own narrative seem relatively credible, Luo Youzhi made some intentional mistakes in the selection of historical facts. As she believes, “In Tibet, the demise of the Qing Dynasty brought the head of the Gelug Sect of Tibetan Buddhism in exile in India and the nominal leader of Tibet, the Dalai Lama, back to Tibet. Tibetans expelled Han officials and troops and declared independence. Until 1950, Tibet enjoys an independent status in terms of de jure. Khalkha Mongolia declared independence in 1912, calling Jebtsundamba Hutuktu, the supreme leader of Tibetan Buddhism here, the leader of the new country, and using Bokdo Gegen ( Holy Emperor). This became the forerunner of the Mongolian state". And "Xinjiang has in fact been separated from China's control since 1922 and entered the sphere of influence of the Soviet Union."

The government of the Republic of China followed the example of the Qing agency and established the Mongolian-Tibetan Committee in 1912, which was responsible for dealing with ethnic minorities in Mongolia, Tibet and other places. The picture shows the seal of the Mongolian and Tibetan Committee Russia National Day / Photo courtesy

After a little verification of the above remarks, it will be found that Luo Youzhi has repeatedly made fallacies in disregard of historical facts. In fact, from 1912 to 1913, it was the army sent by Zhao Erxun, governor of Sichuan in the Qing Dynasty, who were expelled from Tibet. The army leader Zhong Ying and the minister in Tibet, Lianyu, were both Manchus. In October 1912, the government of the Republic of China granted the Dalai Lama's request to restore his title, which was removed by the Qing government in 1910. In the 1930s, the selection and canonization of the reincarnated soul boy of the 14th Dalai Lama was also supervised by representatives sent by the central government of the Republic of China and completed in accordance with the procedures of the Qing Dynasty. Luo Youzhi's so-called "de jure" independent status of Tibet before 1950 is based on the "Simla Conference Agreement" concocted by British representative McMahon, which is an illegal document that has never been approved by the Chinese government.

Luo Youzhi's so-called "Khalka Mongols declared independence in 1912" is a typical sophistry taken out of context. Outer Mongolia did declare "independence" for a time, but by 1915, Outer Mongolia publicly declared that it "recognizes the suzerainty of China... as a part of China's territory" and that "Bok Doje Butsundamba Hutuktu Khan The name is conferred by the President of the Republic of China, and the official documents of Outer Mongolia use the calendar of the Republic of China."

After the fall of the Qing Dynasty, Yang Zengxin and Jin Shuren, who were successively in charge of the military and political power in Xinjiang, were all loyal to the Republic of China and fully accepted the government orders of the Republic of China. In 1922, the year the Soviet Union was founded, Xinjiang was still firmly in the hands of the Chinese government. Therefore, Luo Youzhi's so-called "Xinjiang has in fact been separated from China's control and entered the sphere of influence of the Soviet Union since 1922" is pure nonsense.

As a senior scholar who served as the former chairman of the American Association for Asian Studies, it is impossible for Luo Youzhi not to understand the above-mentioned concise historical facts. People despise.

Who is "constructing history" for the "terrorist" forces?

Luo Youzhi also pointed out that politicians such as Sun Yat-sen, Chiang Kai-shek, Mao Zedong, and scholars represented by Liang Qichao all strongly advocated Sinicization and the elimination of other national characteristics, which promoted the emergence of a strong Han national consciousness. Therefore, "Although the Constitution has always defined China as a multi-ethnic country, from Sun Yat-sen to Mao Zedong, Chinese leaders have always insisted that China should be dominated by the Han nationality", and its essence is still "adhere to nationalism."

This statement shows Rawski's ignorance of the relevant history. First of all, in the 1920s and 1930s, the government of the Republic of China clearly interpreted the "Chinese nation" as the concept of a large nation including Mongolian, Tibetan and other domestic ethnic groups. Secondly, in terms of political practice, the government of the Republic of China continued the trend of establishing provinces in Xinjiang, Taiwan, and Northeast China since the late Qing Dynasty, and successively established Rehe, Chahar, and Xikang provinces. The difference is that New China implemented ethnic equality. Based on the regional ethnic autonomy policy, the establishment of autonomous regions for ethnic minorities.

Distinguishing national identity is the premise and basis for realizing true national equality. Based on this understanding, the government of the People's Republic of China began to identify ethnic groups in 1950, and by 1979, 56 ethnic groups were finally identified. It is an unprecedented pioneering work in the history of ethnic studies in the world to carry out ethnic identification in such a large range. If according to what Luo Youzhi said, my country adheres to Han nationalism and pursues Sinicization with the purpose of eliminating the characteristics of other nationalities, then why is it so necessary to identify so many ethnic groups? Why bother to establish autonomous regions for ethnic minorities?

In addition, Luo Youzhi's ambiguous attitude towards the "East Turkistan" issue is also very worthy of vigilance. She believes that it was the rise of Han nationalism and the oppression of the Sinicization movement that led to the so-called "failure of several attempts to establish the East Turkestan Republic in 1933, 1944, and 1949." The implication is that several "East Turkistan" violent incidents in the 1930s and 1940s were just. She also pointed out that the ethnic policy of the People's Republic of China is "similar to the period of the Republic of China . The discourse of assimilation also resists the national integration policy of the Republic period.” Although "East Turkistan" had not been designated as a terrorist organization by the United Nations in 1996 when Rawski made this statement, its terrorist activities had occurred repeatedly, and its plot to split China was very explicit. Isn't Luo Youzhi's remarks deliberately "constructing history" for the "East Turkistan" separatist forces? Obviously, this is no longer a historical point of view, but a naked political statement.

In short, on the one hand, Luo Youzhi fabricated the so-called "Han nationalism" as the reason for the centrifugal tendency in the border areas in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China; "The nationalist and politicized historical narrative deconstructs the historical facts of China as a unified multi-ethnic country. The harm is not only to compete with us for academic discourse power, but also to "construct history" in order to deconstruct China's sovereign unity and territorial integrity. . For this essence, we should have a clear understanding and vigilance.

Dai Xu, the representative of the Chinese hawks, made an astonishing statement: China will be dismembered by 2030, and China is facing the crisis of being divided up for the third time

   History is not far away. In 1840, Europe carved up China for the first time; in 1894, China's Westernization Movement was the first failure of reform and opening up, and the world carved up China for the second time.

During the two divisions in the past 50 years, China lost Japan in the Chinese cultural circle, the Korean Peninsula; Southeast Asia; Taiwan; large areas of Northeast China and Mongolia.

China is like a huge ice cube that has been knocked out by the West.

It was only because of the outbreak of World War II, when imperialist countries bit dogs, that China narrowly escaped from the mouths of Japan and the West. After that, the rise of the Soviet Union held back the Western powers, and China joined the Eastern camp to hold its homeland.

However, now that the Soviet Union has fallen, the third division of China by the West is brewing again. In the past, the Diaoyu Islands issue, the South China Sea issue and the southern Tibet issue were all dormant. It's all out now. And all these issues, control is not on the side of China. And behind all the problems, there is the United States.

In addition to further plundering China's territorial waters and territories, the United States is still engaging in China's only two or three small neighboring countries that can be called friends, and it is also trying to dismember Tibet and Xinjiang.

I have always had a strong premonition: in the next 10 to 20 years, that is, around 2020 to 2030, there will be a massacre against China!

This is not alarmist talk, but has historical logic.

Let's think about it, from the 16th century to the 18th century, the West used the name of great geographical discovery to plunder everywhere, including gold and silver in South America, timber and black slaves in Africa; great geographical discovery is actually a great discovery of wealth. By the 19th century they had discovered the richest China in the world. In 1840, China was the richest country in the world. By 1940, it was robbed by the world in a hundred years, leaving only a piece of scorched earth, and became the poorest country in the world. There are nearly a hundred wars that can be called the scale of wars that took place on the land of China. These wars are taking away China's wealth. They defeated China on Chinese soil, made China pay compensation, and cede land. How is this different from a robber's behavior when he enters someone's house? If you have money, you get money, if you don’t have money, you get things and land. If you don’t have anything, let others lend you money. Didn’t China borrow money from Europe to pay back Japan in the end? In the end, they murdered their men, raped their women, and burned their houses. Isn’t that how the ruins of the Old Summer Palace were left?

If China knew how to protect its wealth back then, Chinese people are much richer than Americans today. It is a pity that history cannot be assumed.

After taking over China, they took over each other. Tired from the two world wars, they wanted to carry out the second industrial revolution and discovered oil in the Middle East, so they went to the Middle East to seize it. The Middle East has been fighting for more than 50 years, until now.

Looking back at this history, what laws will we find? That is, when a region becomes the focus of world strategy, that is, when you become the food that everyone wants to fight for, the war that will be waged around you can take as short as four or fifty years and as long as nearly a hundred years.

Now, today's China is just like China after the Opium War and the Westernization Movement. When you have money, you gain weight. That's why carnivores have come.

The Chinese have always dreamed of revival and rise, but in the eyes of the United States and Japan, what they think about is when a fat cow has grown up and when it will be slaughtered. Isn't that the case with the Westernization Movement of more than one hundred years? After more than 30 years of "reform and opening up", China has accumulated a lot of wealth. Japan suddenly pounced on it, like a wild wolf biting a cow's egg, and knocked China down. Then other beasts pounced on and ransacked China. Now, it has been another 30 years since China's reform and opening up, and a lot of money has been made, and they are jealous again. Especially seeing that many Chinese people are not vigilant and do not think about making progress, I feel that there is an opportunity to take advantage of it.

Therefore, the United States led a group of old carnivores in Europe, and brought a group of small animals in Asia, wandering around the big yellow ox in China, looking for places and opportunities to attack—some openly occupy Chinese islands, wantonly Grab Chinese resources; some sell stones to China as diamonds, and some...the whole world is able to bully China.

I have a hunch that in the future China will either encounter a huge internal war, or one after another of wars around it, or both will come together. Once fighting and chaos arise, the time will not be short. I judge that the United States will not fight China directly, because the great powers will shake the ground and the mountains will shake, and the United States has always let others take the lead. The war in the surrounding areas may happen first, and the United States intervenes to consume China first. Except for the South China Sea, these wars may lead to nuclear wars. When China is tired of fighting and its surrounding areas are tired, the United States should come out, like the two world wars, to be a fisherman and pick up the fruits of Asia's development in the past 50 years.

Why 2020 and 2030? Just look at the timetable for the transformation that the United States has set for its own military. By around 2025, the current four major military services in the United States will all be transformed. At that time, it also had two new military branches, one was the space army and the other was the cyber army, and these two were the main forces. The six major military services adopt the theory of "fighting all over the world in one hour". In the past, the United States used beheading actions against small countries; in the future, it will quickly paralyze its strategy against large countries.

I would like to briefly introduce the new US military strategy. It hits the world's three major weapon systems in one hour, one is the trinity intercontinental missile equipped with conventional warheads, the other is aerospace bombers, and the third is space weapons and cyber weapons. After that, it is the stealth air force and unmanned attack aircraft, robot army and so on. Its defense system is the global anti-missile system. Both offensive and defensive. In order to implement this latest theory, the United States has been working on digital earth, which is actually to establish military geographic information on the earth. Its reconnaissance satellites have already scanned the earth, and its reconnaissance planes flying around the world are further supplementing the information. They also enrich this information base by taking videos and photos through the legal travel of American citizens around the world. In the past two years, China has successively discovered that the Japanese engaged in surveying and mapping in places such as Xinjiang and Gansu. In fact, they were providing strategic information for Japan and the United States. During the Qing Dynasty, Japan began to measure the geography of China. Now it starts again.

Why 2020 and 2030? It also lies in the fact that China's development model today will reach a dangerous critical point at this time.

We used the tickets to blow up a balloon. But balloons will explode, just look at Japan, the bubble will burst. However, Japan is a high-tech country with the protection of the United States. Its economic bubble burst and it just started from scratch. What about China? The day the bubble bursts must be the time of war. This war, if I am unfortunate enough to say that the ending is more serious than a hundred years ago, I think it will be divided. The United States, Japan, including Taiwan, have long had "China's seven pieces of theory". We can't just take it as a joke. In 2030, when my bubble is blown to the maximum, it is also the time when the United States and other powers have completed the construction of a new type of army, and the time when the sword is out of the sheath. Looking back at history, it can be seen that after each new military revolution in the world, the world political structure is reshuffled next, and the party with military superiority will carry out bloody massacres against the party with military inferiority in order to seize wealth. I don't know if we'll catch up to the world in terms of military change in 2030. Because, without an industrial base, a technological base, or an economic base, what is there to pursue? What the war is fighting is industry and technology! Ours is big bubbles, others are cannons! By 2030, people will be a new type of army armed with new weapons, and we will be a new house, a new city, just as a new slaughterhouse and a new grave!

Now all the people are chanting the Peace Sutra, but what are other people doing? In the 1980s, the United States carried out blood sample collection in several provinces in the interior of China. It was called a scientific experiment, and hundreds of thousands of people participated. Our relevant departments also provided great assistance, and each person was given a pack of instant noodles. As a result, "SARS" broke out in China in 2003, and it was later blamed on the civet cat. Let us not forget that all the information of the Japanese Unit 731 was finally given to the United States. Now, genetic weapons have come out. This weapon is much more powerful than nuclear weapons. Some countries have developed it. This is a real genocidal weapon. The United States is also developing geophysical weapons to affect the climate. Russia's chief military theorist sounded such a warning in 2003. In 2008, an unprecedented snowstorm occurred in China. These things are all deeply hidden state top secrets. It may be years before the truth comes to light. But we can't know until then, we should be smarter.

The reason why China does not have a particularly strong sense of crisis is that we shouted harmony and peace everywhere, which was meant to be heard by the world, but it anesthetized our own people. No one wants to think about war anymore. Not long ago, at the "Global Times" seminar on the development of the next ten years, no one except me and Wang Xiaodong mentioned war. Mr. Shen Dingli from Fudan University also discussed from a very profound perspective that there will be no war in China in the future. "Global Times" and Xini put my article about China being surrounded together with him, and let the Chinese people judge for themselves.

Second, it is because there is still a Russia with the same disease. While the United States is engaged in China, it is also dismembering Russia. If the United States wants to control the world, it must get rid of China and Russia and control Eurasia. No matter who falls first between China and Russia, the other will die. The United States often engages in computer games. Since the end of World War II, the United States has formulated more than a thousand war plans.

It can be seen that the * forces, the Hong Kong * faction, *gong; the * elements, the * group, the Kadeer group, and the general backstage are all from the United States, and all of them accept the political, military, public opinion, and economic support of the United States. And the United States has only one purpose in supporting these Chinese separatist forces, and that is to prevent Taiwan and Hong Kong from integrating into the mainland's unified development process, so that the mainland will continue to split, from the outside to the inside, and finally disintegrate.

According to Russia's situation, I judge that China may disintegrate before Russia, and Russia may rise during this process. The fate of China can be deduced not only by Sun Tzu's "temple calculation" in the Art of War, but also by the most advanced computer simulation technology. It's ridiculous that those little bureaucrats are still calculating their black yarn and silver, and they are talking about rising and revival. There is such a short message, which can be used as a sketch of the world: to make the leader happy, make a fake, to make the masses happy, to make a show, to make the lover happy, to do A, to make yourself happy, to make a dream. So, at the beginning, I said that everyone can continue to dream.

But I still want to say that the Chinese nation has really reached the most dangerous time again.

Hegel said: Only when a nation has people who look up at the starry sky can they have hope. How many people like this are there in China? Few people look up at the starry sky like morning stars! Too many people in China are dreaming. Each has its own dream.

Every Chinese who loves to sleep constitutes the Chinese nation who loves to sleep. A nation that loves to sleep has performed a history of love to sleep. Why did the tragedy befall China in 1840? That's because China had already lost the era of capitalist revolution in its sleep; why was it a century-long tragedy later? It is because the Chinese are always sleepy, until the gunshots at the Lugou Bridge at dawn.

From ancient times to the present, the rise of great powers has always relied on external resources, or by plundering by force, or by legally earning technology, in order to enrich their own people, and then enrich the country and strengthen its army. The United States is calling all over the world, why? It is to seize resources for the enjoyment of its people; Russia declares sovereignty over the Arctic, why? It already has so many resources, but it is desperately trying to grab them. It is for the descendants. We don't have the power to take it from the world, but we want to take back our own place. We cannot let the sincerity and advocacy of peace become a rope for others to bind us. We're going to act like a normal country. I have always advocated that our military should undergo expeditionary transformation to be able to defend our resources and ocean-going interests.

We must dare to meet reasonable and legal wars, improve the security situation, stimulate the economy, and lift up the national spirit. The stable situation of New China and the period of good economic development are the result of several self-defense counterattacks. Wolves are driven away, not persuaded.

China needs strategists, and more importantly, people who are determined, brave and full of sense of urgency. There is no invincible enemy in the world, and there is no difficulty facing China that cannot be overcome. The greatest danger is not seeing the danger. Many of our scholars and officials only see flowers, wine, GDP, power and women, like a short-sighted herbivore.

Don't sleep, friends! We cannot be so lowly that we only seek ease and carnal enjoyment. We can't lose everything for money, we can't be poor and only have money!

We should have lofty goals and an indomitable courageous spirit, dare to face all difficulties and challenges, dare to break through the siege, welcome the victory, bring peace to all generations, and create a new China like a strong man and a prosperous Tang Dynasty for our descendants!

I hope that with you and us, we cannot hand over our responsibilities to the next generation!

During the War of Resistance Against Japan, the Chinese had a saying: China will not perish without me!

Today we also want to say the same thing: China is strong, with me!

  Long live the motherland!

"India Today" magazine has been in the limelight in the past two days. Its latest issue covers a map of China without Tibet and Taiwan. Below it is a map of Pakistan. Its title is "China's new chicken", Further explanation in the article is: Chinese chickens are clamping India with Pakistani chicks.

This kind of hysterical geopolitical imagination is not new, and the ingenuity of "India Today" is that it unloads two pieces of China, namely Tibet and Taiwan. This caused laughter, hisses and curses. "India Today" is said to be the magazine with the largest circulation in the country, and it was once considered one of the "most serious" media in India. What it shows to the world is such a bear.

If the mainstream media can usually show the general level of a country's elite group between the lines, "India Today" can be regarded as a disgrace to the Indian elite. It has been rumored that there are "two Indias" in the outside world. One is grassroots India, which is one of the groups with the highest concentration of illiteracy and the lowest cultural quality in the world. The other is elite India, which is said to be in line with the United States and Europe, and its level is not low. But "India Today" shows that the elites of this country are quite like a group of idiots. They have a superficial arrogance formed by overpowering a large number of Indian grassroots for a long time.

It is understandable that some elites in India hate China at the moment of the border confrontation between China and India. It is not difficult to understand that I really want to cut off China's Tibet and Taiwan. But they knew that they had no ability to achieve this, so they drew a picture and got it on the cover of the magazine "Looking for plums and quenching thirst". They can reach this level with Ah Q. To paraphrase the name of an Indian Bollywood movie, it is really "I am a god". ! The magazine proudly claims that the cover of this issue was voted "Best Cover of the Day" by the Society of Publishing Designers of America, which is particularly impressive. If India encounters any difficulties in the future, just invite the designer of this magazine to come out and solve them all.

India is indeed incapable of being China's opponent. Indian officials have lowered their tone recently because they saw that the People's Liberation Army is really preparing for a military showdown. The latest statement said that India is committed to finding a friendly solution acceptable to the countries involved to resolve the border standoff. However, China's attitude will not change. If India does not withdraw its troops in accordance with international law, we will force it to withdraw. Before that, we will not negotiate with it.

How can India have the ability to cut off China's Tibet and Taiwan? It can't do it even if it uses all its strength to nurse. Only magazine editors can help Indians relieve their anger. If China and India want to compete to "split each other", India will definitely lose without even underwear left. China is really capable of making its northeastern states independent, if China is "very angry" and wants to do that.

India should honestly withdraw its troops to its own side of the Sikkim section of the border. Before China's patience is finally exhausted, it will be wiser and lose face, but it can keep as much as it can. Once China is determined to take a comprehensive countermeasure, Indian officials and media elites can only slap each other in the face and accuse the other party of screwing things up. At that time, it will be as meaningless for them to scold China as scolding the Himalayas.

"India Today" allows us to see how inferior the nationalist ideology behind Indian policy makers is. It is not the will at all, but the clamor and noise of the mob. Unreasonable and immoral, the Indian army crossed the Sino-Indian border like a bunch of gangsters. What China is facing is not the problem of how to deal with these Indian soldiers at all, but the problem that a large number of rogues gathered in the market to make trouble is not so easy to deal with, but the outcome of restoring order is certain. Of course, if the level of obscenity in "India Today" is super high, India, which lives in a dream world, will never lose.

After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the United States did not give up on further dismembering Russia. From the 30-year history of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, it can be seen that Russia has experienced civil wars, color revolutions, NATO’s eastward expansion, and the current Russo-Ukraine War. In the final analysis, it is the United States’ plan to dismember Russia.

The dismemberment plan formulated by the US CIA breaks up Russia into several small countries, and completely destroys Russia's nuclear weapons, so that the US can become the global leader.

When we see the US plan to dismember Russia, we always think that this is a matter between Russia and the US and has nothing to do with China. In fact, the United States also has plans to dismember our country, so we must be vigilant.

The United States not only has a plan to dismember Russia, but also a plan to dismember China. We must be vigilant!

One Why dismember China?

Many people regard the United States as a "beacon of democracy" and believe that the United States represents the most advanced, democratic, and free country in the world. But on the contrary, the United States just confuses the whole world with many illusions.

Dai Xu, a famous military expert in our country, once had a word worthy of vigilance. He said: "The sixth strategic shift of the United States is to encircle and dismember China!" secondary strategic shift. The reason why China has been attacked in recent years is that China has become an important target of the sixth strategic shift of the United States.

First of all, the previous strategic goals of the United States have ensured that the United States is strong.

Let's take a look at 5 strategic shifts in the history of the United States, and each time it helped the United States become stronger.

The United States is a young country with a history of only 200 years. In the 19th century, the United States was unwilling to be the leader in North America, and the genes of robbers played a role again. If the United States wants to become the boss, it needs to defeat the former bosses one by one, and the boss at that time was Spain, so the Spanish-American War broke out.

The goal of the United States is not only to defeat Spain, but also to dismember Spain's colonies around the world, and then develop to the Pacific Ocean and enter Europe.

The first strategic transfer of the United States was very successful, and it gained many Spanish colonies. Then they entered Europe, continued to expand to the places where their ancestors lived, and defeated the old European empires, Britain and France, and the United States achieved a second strategic shift.

In the process of defeating Europe, the United States invaded China with European powers in the 19th century, and the United States tasted the sweetness of gaining benefits through war.

In the early days of World War II, the United States did not intervene in the war, but continued to sell weapons and other urgent necessities to the belligerent countries. After the United States made a fortune in war, it began to enter the field. The United States is going to realize the third strategic shift. After the victory of World War II, the United States gained the most benefits and became the largest creditor country, completely dismembering Europe.

After World War II, the world entered the Cold War, and a camp represented by the two superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union was formed. The biggest goal of the United States at this time is to disintegrate the Soviet Union and realize the fourth strategic shift.

The United States not only has a plan to dismember Russia, but also a plan to dismember China. We must be vigilant!

It took the United States nearly half of the world to dismember the Soviet Union and successfully complete the strategic shift. But the United States did not stop, and he set his target on the Middle East, because the Middle East was the sphere of influence of the Soviet Union before, and the United States could not enter.

After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the United States dismembered the Middle East. From the Gulf War to the Iraq War, the Syrian War, the Yemen Civil War, and the Libyan Civil War, the United States completed its fifth strategic shift and realized huge benefits.

Second, the United States believes it is a threat from China.

It stands to reason that the United States should be satisfied with completing five strategic shifts and gaining so many benefits, but the United States is not satisfied, but instead focuses on China. In the eyes of the United States, China has become the biggest threat to the United States.

Some people will say that now that the United States is intervening in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine to suppress Russia, it has no major actions against China. In fact, it is wrong to think this way. The United States' suppression of Russia is actually a prelude to dealing with China. Russia is finished, the next must be China.

The United States knows that China is difficult to deal with, because more than 70 years ago, in the Korean War, China was still weak in strength and still resolutely sent troops to North Korea and defeated the powerful US military. Since then, the United States has looked at China differently and put China on hold, hoping to wait until the collapse of the Soviet Union before taking action.

But it was the War to Resist U.S. Aggression and Aid Korea that made the U.S. realize that a powerful China is about to rise. The history of Western powers being able to invade and occupy China with a few guns has completely passed.

As an ancient nation with a history of 5,000 years, the dismemberment of the United States will not succeed, but the attempt of the United States will not stop, because it is impossible for two powerful countries to coexist again.

The United States not only has a plan to dismember Russia, but also a plan to dismember China. We must be vigilant!

Today in the world, the only country that can challenge the United States is China. Because the United States regards the dismemberment of China as the sixth strategic shift.

In the eyes of the United States, China is a different opponent, never participating in international conflicts, and developing itself in obscurity. However, China has been reformed for decades, and its economy has become the second largest in the world after the United States. China is also the country with the most complete industrial system in the world, and even the United States cannot do it. Its military strength also ranks third in the world. Moreover, China has proposed the "One Belt, One Road" economic development strategy, and its global influence is becoming greater and greater. Such a powerful country will of course be considered a threat by the United States.

Third, dismembering China is good for the United States?

Dismembering China, in addition to allowing the United States to complete the sixth strategic shift and gain huge benefits, it will benefit the United States a lot.

1. Completely dominate the world.

If China is dismembered, it will be difficult for any country in the world to challenge the hegemony of the United States, and the ambition of the United States to dominate the world will be realized, and no one will dare to provoke it. Don't think that we are patient with the United States now. Our strategic plan does not yet have a plan for a decisive battle with the United States. If the United States continues to suppress China, it will fail. Therefore, the United States does not dare to act rashly. Their goal is to disintegrate China and make China lose its ability to challenge the United States.

2. Ensure geographical advantage.

If China is disintegrated, the United States will gain more territory in Asia, especially the developed East Asia, which will be controlled by the United States. US military can easily control Asia.

3. Obtain huge benefits.

If China is dismembered into several small countries, the United States will gain huge benefits. You can enslave China and trample China under your feet.

The United States not only has a plan to dismember Russia, but also a plan to dismember China. We must be vigilant!

2 How to dismember?

The United States has plans and plans to dismember any country. No matter how long it takes, the goal of the United States will not change. For example, it took the United States to dismember the Soviet Union for more than half a century. So how does the United States dismember China?

One is to make a plan.

An American think tank once proposed to the President of the United States a strategic concept to split China, which is said to be called "2049". What kind of idea is this?

According to data, in 2014, an American think tank proposed to split China into four parts and block Chinese trade routes. It is the well-known Rand Corporation in the United States who proposed this conspiracy to split China. This think tank even drew a map of China that was divided by China's ethnic issues 30 years later. In order to divide and weaken China, the United States even conceived of using mines to block the Strait of Malacca and China's overseas trade channels.

The second is to confuse China.

In order to achieve the goal of splitting China, the Rand Corporation of the United States has simulated more than 1,900 Taiwan Strait wars. The Rand Corporation researched 10 years ago that the deployment of anti-ship missiles in the South China Sea would block the Chinese military within the first island chain.

The United States is advancing in various ways to dismember China. First, it promotes the China threat theory. From the U.S.’s point of view, the weakening of China’s strength after the reform has made the U.S. aware of the threat. Therefore, the “China threat theory” must be thrown out first, so that more countries can participate in the U.S. conspiracy to dismember China.

After World War II, the goal of the United States was to dominate the world, and this goal has not changed. When it came to the "global leadership" proposed by Obama. If the United States wants to lead the world, it must attack countries that threaten the United States.

China's long-term policy of keeping a low profile and looking forward to peaceful development. However, some countries regard China's development strategy as tolerance and have invaded and occupied many Chinese islands and reefs. China hopes to resolve disputes peacefully, but some countries regard China's restraint as weakness. In fact, our approach to peacefully resolving disputes is not to be afraid of any country. But China's policy of keeping a low profile will not let the United States give up its plot to dismember China.

The United States will also appear as "democracy and freedom" or even "human rights", constantly accusing China of "violating human rights" or even being "undemocratic", and trying to mess up China from within.

The United States not only has a plan to dismember Russia, but also a plan to dismember China. We must be vigilant!

The third is to work hard in all directions.

There are many ways for the United States to dismember China. Just now we mentioned that the United States will adopt some deceptive methods, but the United States will also use some methods that are often used around the world to attack China.

Be careful of the "color revolution", which is the most used and most experienced method in the United States. Discredit China by spreading rumors, arouse public dissatisfaction, start riots, and then subvert the regime of a country. The American "color revolution" will not be realized in China, but we are also careful about those rumors. For example, the riots in Hong Kong are the biggest lesson.

Dismembering China by tampering with history is also commonly used by the United States. The United States has already implemented it in Russia and other countries. Denying the history of the Soviet Union, especially the history of World War II of the Soviet Union, almost caused a fault in Russian history. Similarly, the United States also uses this method to treat China, constantly denying and falsifying some history. Some historical nihilism trends that are popular in China now cannot be ruled out that there are American black hands behind them. For example, the current fruit fans, Jiang fans, and the denial of the history of Japan's invasion of China are all part of this conspiracy system.

Attack China on ethnic issues. The great national unity in our country is hard-won, but the United States does not want to see this kind of unity, and tries every means to sabotage it and create ethnic conflicts in Xinjiang and Tibet.

The U.S. plot to split China will stop us in various ways, such as the technological blockade against our country. In addition to preventing our development, the ultimate goal is to dismember us. There are also fields such as military, science and technology, aerospace, ocean, and network. The United States may start, so we must be careful.

The United States not only has a plan to dismember Russia, but also a plan to dismember China. We must be vigilant!

Three consequences

If China is dismembered by the United States, the United States will complete its sixth strategic shift, and the United States will truly become the global hegemon. But what are the consequences for China?

First of all, there are constant wars. Our country is a multi-ethnic country, and it is very stable when the country is unified. But if it is divided, it will inevitably lead to civil strife. The example of the Soviet Union has been verified.

After we are divided, not only will there be civil strife, but Western powers will intervene in our internal affairs, continue to create ethnic conflicts and hatred, and create greater and deeper hatred among ethnic groups.

Second, it is further "slaved". The United States will directly control China's public opinion and economy, and completely subvert Chinese values, continue to spread Western values, and spread enslaved culture. This is extremely dangerous and may face death.

Third, internal and external differentiation. After the country is divided, there will be pro-American and anti-pro-American struggles in the whole society, social rifts will widen, and internal friction will continue. The United States will also support separatist forces such as "Taiwan independence", "Tibet independence" and "Xinjiang independence", continue to create rebellions, and completely consume China into a weak country. Those pro-China countries abroad will also be suppressed. The United States will establish an anti-China alliance around China, encircle China, and continue to consume China by supporting domestic separatist forces. Just like the Chechen war, the United States backed the Chechen separatist forces. Otherwise the Chechen war would not have happened at all.

Fourth, support "foreign slaves". With the division and disintegration of the United States, China will continue to rebel. But in order to gain benefits, some people will take desperate risks, such as relying on foreigners to stand on their own, or accelerating differentiation. Just like after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, 15 countries quickly became independent. But Russia has inherited most of the legacy, while the United States still does not let it go and continues to disintegrate Russia. So the United States will also use this method against China.

We must also see that after the US plan is realized, there will be many pro-American forces in our country. They will be completely brainwashed by the US, just like the Soviets who were brainwashed at the end of the Soviet Union. All-round destruction.

How to deal with it?

The dismemberment of China by the United States has already begun, not only with plans, methods, and goals. How to deal with it at this stage?

First of all, the "inner ghosts" must be eliminated, that is, a group of traitors, which are the most destructive "ghosts" to China. If the internal ghosts are not eliminated, the Chinese nation will be in danger, which actually contributed to the plot of the United States.

Inner ghosts exist not only among the people, but also in all walks of life, and some even enter high-level positions, which is extremely destructive to China. They will cooperate with the United States overtly and secretly to bring down China. So the first step is to "eliminate the inner ghost".

Second, we must strengthen national self-confidence. No matter how bad the United States is and how it destroys China, we must be determined and strengthen our confidence in the victory of the Chinese nation. Clarify the rumors in time and crack down on the creators. It is also necessary to continue to expose the conspiracy of the United States. Don't treat the US conspiracy as a secret, let the majority know.

Third, be bloody. We have been away from war for more than 40 years. We must let the new generation of young people know what we were in the past, what we have experienced, and pursue the blood of our ancestors. We must also know what we are going to do now, vigorously publicize the revolutionary tradition and the great achievements of revolutionary martyrs, and strengthen their blood. If we do not occupy, the enemy will occupy, and we will be in danger.

There is both historical confidence and blood in it. Regarding the provocation by the United States, we should take action as soon as possible, and we must not let young people see "fear". There is no such word as "fear" in the Chinese nation.

The United States not only has a plan to dismember Russia, but also a plan to dismember China. We must be vigilant!

Why did Putin dare to act?

Putin is for the bloody continuation of the fighting nation. Putin once said that he has to fight. If he does not fight, the danger will be even greater. In the same way, we also face this situation.

As Dai Xu said: "A country and a nation must dare to show their swords. This is to win the minimum dignity and right to live in this world where the law of the jungle prevails."

一段删节的文字谈起

　　美国匹茨堡大学教授罗友枝（Evelyn Rawski）《再观清代——论清代在中国历史上的意义》（简称《再观清代》）被视为“新清史”旗帜性之作。该文发表于1996年，系统表述了“新清史”的代表性观点。两年后，华人学者何炳棣以《捍卫汉化——驳罗友枝之<再观清代>》一文激烈回应。此后，“新清史”成为海内外中国史学界的热点话题，迄今未歇。鉴于此，笔者参与编辑《清朝的国家认同—— “新清史”研究与争鸣》时，将该文中译本收为第一篇。但出于种种原因，当时删去第4节“清史和中国的民族主义”（Qing History and Chinese Nationalism）。

　　此后10年中，不断有学者对这种删减原文的做法提出异议，认为删去该文第4节，不仅无法全面体现罗友枝的学术观点，更使广大国内读者不能了解罗友枝在学术之外的用心。

　　罗友枝《再观清代》第4节题为“清史和中国的民族主义”，其核心观点是：从清末民初到中华人民共和国的汉人“民族主义”勃兴与压迫，及中国领导人提倡汉化、去除非汉民族特性的政策压力，导致了民国以来蒙、藏、新疆地区民族主义的兴起和政治离心倾向的发展， 蒙、藏地区“独立”符合法理。这些谬论突出表现了作者越出学术研究的政治目的。

　　昧于史实或别有用心？

　　罗友枝无视从清朝、中华民国到中华人民共和国统一多民族国家的延续性。

　　《雍正帝行乐图·道装像》

　　“清朝不等于中国”是“新清史”的重要观点，《再观清代》对这一观点的凝练起到了关键作用。罗友枝对清至民国历史转变的阐释，从一开始就秉持一种错误认知：中国指的是汉人的活动区域——内地，边疆地区不属于汉人，也就不属于中国。因此她提出，“从建立之初，中华民国就面临着在一个民族国家中，既要坚持汉族民族主义，又渴望保留清朝全部疆域的根本性矛盾”。而造成这种矛盾的原因是，“辛亥革命将满人、蒙古人、维吾尔人和藏人从清帝国的束缚中解放出来， 给予他们建立自己民族国家的可能性。对清帝国的忠诚并不等同于对于新成立的中华民国的忠诚”。

　　上述论述涉及的核心问题是，从清朝到中华民国是否有历史的延续性，主权是否保持统一？

　　辛亥革命的爆发的确引发了内地各省及蒙、藏、新疆等地民众对中国未来走向的思考，“脱清独立”一度成为一种政治风潮。但是，这种“独立”并不是一种国家主权意义上的独立，而是相对于清廷统治的“独立”，并且随着中华民国建立，认同中华民国的政治秩序迅速恢复。

　　1911年底，外蒙古宣布“独立”时就称，“现值南方大乱，各省独立，清皇权势，日就凌夷，国体变更，指日可待。。。。。。满、汉之现象如此，亦满洲之不德所致也”。从中可知，和南方各省一样，外蒙古反对的是清政府的“不德”统治，希望“国体变更”，而非自外于统一多民族国家。因此，民国建立后不久，外蒙古就公开宣布自己仍是中国领土之一部分。

　　另外，面对辛亥革命以后蒙、藏地区的所谓“独立”，民初政府作了很多政治上的调适，以确保国家的统一。如承认清帝退位时的《待遇蒙藏条例》，通过劝谕、册封、厚给利益等方式，怀柔蒙、藏、新疆各地上层人士，保障其利益；将《待遇蒙藏条例》的主要内容列为《中华民国约法》第 64、65条，保证“中华民国元年二月十二日所宣布之。。。。。。满、蒙、回、藏各族待遇条件，永不变更其效力”。同时，确保蒙、藏、新疆等地在国会中有各自的议员名额。所以，在民国初期虽然政权更替了，“国体变更”了，但作为统一多民族国家的制度框架并没有变，统一的主权国家也没有变，在此框架内，边疆各民族留有足够的政治空间和地位。

　　从根本上说，清末民初的政权更迭是一国内政，并未影响边疆民众对新政权的向心力，也未削弱民国政府对边疆地区的有效管辖，中华民国成功地延续了清朝在蒙、藏等边疆地区的统治合法性。

　　任何一名合格的历史学者，在对如此重要的历史问题进行评判时，都应保持对历史延续性的基本认知。罗友枝有意割断从清朝到中华民国的内在联系，忽视民初政府维护统一多民族国家的积极举措，这种做法要么是昧于史实，要么是别有用心。

　　究竟谁在肢裂中国的边疆？

　　罗友枝妄断：清末民初，汉商进入蒙、藏等边疆地区引起了当地人的强烈反对，正是汉民族这种“侵略性”导致了中国陷入分裂危机。但她对英、俄等西方国家对蒙、藏等地的肆意干涉只字不提。

　　现有研究表明，试图借助清末民初蒙、藏等边疆地区“脱清独立” 倾向而分裂中国边疆地区的，正是英、俄两国。如1912年，民国政府川滇二省军队入藏，收复西康地区，并拟进军拉萨，但迫于英国压力而停止。后来的西姆拉会议还形成了所谓的“协议”， 长期干扰中国对西藏行使主权。因此可知，近代中国维护多民族国家统一的最大阻力，既不是汉人与非汉人之间的矛盾，也非族群认同或民族主义问题，而是英、俄等列强的介入。

　　罗友枝对此视而不见，更将鼓动“蒙藏独立”的英、俄等列强，美化成“救世主”。为使自己的叙事显得相对可信，罗友枝在史实采择上出现了一些有意为之的错误。如她认为，“在西藏，清朝的灭亡使流亡印度的藏传佛教格鲁派首领和西藏名义上的领袖达赖喇嘛回到西藏。藏人驱逐汉人官员和军队，宣布独立。直至1950年，西藏在法理上享有独立地位。喀尔喀蒙古在1912年宣布独立，将藏传佛教在此地的最高领袖哲布尊丹巴呼图克图称为新国家的领导人，并使用博克多葛根（神圣皇帝）这一称号。这成为蒙古国的先驱”。而“新疆自1922年起在事实上脱离了中国控制而进入苏联的势力范围”。

　　民国政府沿袭清代理藩院，于1912年设立蒙藏委员会，专门负责处理蒙古、西藏等地少数民族事务。 图为蒙藏委员会印章 俄国庆 / 供图

　　对上述言论稍作核实，就会发现罗友枝不顾史实、屡发谬论。实际上，1912—1913 年，在西藏被驱逐的是清朝四川总督赵尔巽派去的军队，军队首领钟颖和驻藏大臣联豫都是满人。1912年10月，民国政府允准达赖喇嘛的请求，恢复他在1910年被清政府革去的名号。20世纪30年代，第十四世达赖喇嘛的转世灵童选择及册封，也是由民国中央政府派代表监督，并按清朝的程序完成的。罗友枝所谓的1950年前西藏具有“法理上”的独立地位，依据的是英国代表麦克马洪炮制的“西姆拉会议协议”，而这一协议是从未得到中国政府批准的非法文件。

　　罗友枝所谓的“喀尔喀蒙古在1912年宣布独立”，更是典型的断章取义式的狡辩。外蒙古的确曾一度宣布“独立”，但到1915年，外蒙古就公开宣称“承认中国宗主权。。。。。。为中国领土之一部分”，“博克多哲布尊丹巴呼图克图汗名号，受大中华民国大总统册封，外蒙古公事文件上用民国年历”。

　　清朝覆灭后，先后执掌新疆军政大权的杨增新、金树仁等都效忠于中华民国，完全接受民国政府的政令。在苏联成立的1922年，新疆仍牢牢地掌控在中国政府手中。因此，罗友枝所谓“新疆自1922年起在事实上脱离了中国控制而进入苏联的势力范围”，纯属无稽之谈。

　　作为曾任美国亚洲研究学会主席的资深学者，罗友枝不可能不了解上述如此简明的史实，她为掩饰西方列强对中国边疆的侵略，不惜采取断章取义、取其一而不及其余的做法，着实令人不齿。

　　谁在为“暴恐”势力“构建历史”？

　　罗友枝还提出，孙中山、蒋介石、毛泽东等政治家和以梁启超为代表的学者，都极力提倡汉化、消除其他民族特性，这促使了强烈的汉民族意识的产生。因此，“虽然宪法一直定义中国是多民族国家，但从孙中山到毛泽东，中国的领导人一直坚持中国应以汉族为主导”，其本质仍是“坚持民族主义”。

　　这一论述表明了罗友枝对相关历史的无知。首先，在20世纪二三十年代，民国政府就已明确把“中华民族”解释为包含蒙古、藏等国内各族在内的大民族概念。其次，在政治实践上，民国政府延续了晚清以来新疆、台湾、东北建省的趋势，先后建立热河省、察哈尔省、西康省等；与此不同的是，新中国实行民族平等基础上的民族区域自治政策，建立少数民族自治区。

　　对民族身份的辨别，是实现真正民族平等的前提和基础。正是基于这样的认识，从1950年开始，中华人民共和国政府开展民族识别工作，到1979年最终确定56个民族。在这样大的范围中进行民族识别， 是世界民族研究史上空前的创举。如果按罗友枝所说，我国坚持汉民族主义、追求以消除其他民族特性为目的的汉化，那么，又何必如此兴师动众地去识别那么多民族？又何必建立少数民族自治区？

　　此外，罗友枝对“东突”问题的暧昧态度，也非常值得警惕。她认为，正是汉民族主义的兴起、汉化运动的压迫，才有所谓“1933、1944和1949年几次试图建立东土耳其斯坦共和国失败”。言外之意，20世纪三四十年代数次“东突”暴力事件具有正义性。她还提出，中华人民共和国的民族政策“与民国时期相似。。。。。。也不断镇压民族独立运动，强调其对西藏、新疆和内蒙古的控制”，“使用突厥语系的新疆穆斯林拒绝国民党的同化话语，也同样抵制共和国时期的民族融合政策”。尽管在罗友枝发表这一论说的1996年，“东突”尚未被联合国定为恐怖组织，但其恐怖活动已反复出现，分裂中国的图谋也非常露骨。罗友枝的此番言论，难道不是刻意为“东突”分裂势力“构建历史” 吗？显然，这已经不是一种史学观点，而是一种赤裸裸的政治表态了。

　　要之，罗友枝一方面杜撰所谓“汉民族主义”是清末民初边疆地区离心倾向的原因，另一方面，极力推崇蒙古、藏、维吾尔等族的 “民族主义”，构建一种“非汉”民族主义的、政治化的历史叙事，解构中国作为统一多民族国家历史事实，其危害不仅是要跟我们争夺学术话语权，更是为了解构中国的主权统一和领土完整而“构建历史”。对这一本质，我们应有清醒的认识和警觉。

中国鹰派代表戴旭语出惊人：2030肢解中国、中国正面临第三次被瓜分的危机

  历史并没有远去。1840 年，欧洲第一次对中国瓜分；1894 年，中国洋务运动也就是第一次改革开放失败，世界对中国进行第二次瓜分。

　　在这50年的两次瓜分中，中国失去了中华文化圈中的日本，朝鲜半岛；东南亚；台湾；东北大片领土以及蒙古。

　　中国像一个巨大的冰块，被西方敲掉了一大圈。

　　只是由于二战的爆发，帝国主义国家间狗咬狗，中国才从日本和西方两只狗嘴里死里逃生。之后，苏联的崛起，把西方势力顶住，中国加入东方阵营，才守住本土不失。

　　但是，现在，苏联倒下了，西方对中国的第三次瓜分又在酝酿了。在以往，钓鱼岛问题，南海问题和藏南问题，都是蛰伏着的。现在全都出来了。而且所有这些问题，控制权都不在中国一边。而且所有的问题背后，都有美国。

　　除了进一步掠夺中国的领海、领土，美国还在搞中国仅有的两三个能够称得上朋友的小邻国，还这做试图肢解西藏、新疆的文章。

　　我一直有一种强烈的预感：未来的10到20年，也就是2020到2030年左右，会有一场针对中国的大屠杀大哄抢！

　　这不是危言耸听，而是有着历史的逻辑。

　　让我们想想，从16世纪到18世纪，西方以地理大发现的名义，到处进行掠夺，南美洲的黄金、白银，非洲的木材、黑奴；地理大发现其实就是财富大发现。到19世纪它们发现了世界上最富裕的中国。1840年的时候，中国富甲天下，到1940年的时候，一百年中被世界抢得只剩下一片焦土，成为世界最穷的国家。发生在中国这片土地上的，称得上战争规模的就近百场。这些战争，就是在夺中国的财富。他们在中国的土地上打败中国，让中国赔款，割地。这跟一个强盗到人家里的行为有什么两样？有钱拿钱，没有钱拿东西，拿地，什么都没有就让人家借钱给他－－中国最后不是借欧洲的钱还日本吗？最后还杀人家的男人，强暴人家的女人，烧人家的房子，圆明园遗址不就是这样留下的吗？

　　如果当初中国懂得守护自己的财富，今天中国人比美国人富裕得多。可惜历史不能假设。

　　把中国夺完以后，自己又互相夺。两次世界大战打累了，他们要进行第二次工业革命，发现了中东的石油，于是，又到中东去夺。中东又打了五十多年，一直到现在。

　　回顾这个历史，我们会发现什么规律呢？那就是当一个地区成为世界战略的焦点，也就是当你成为谁都想争抢的食物之后，围绕你所进行的战争，短则四、五十年，长则近百年。

　　现在，今天的中国，就和鸦片战争和洋务运动之后的中国一样，你有钱了，就是长肥了，所以食肉动物都来了。

　　中国人一直梦想的是复兴和崛起，但在美国和日本的眼里，它们思考的是一只肥牛已经长大，何时开刀宰杀。一百多年的洋务运动不就是如此吗？经过三十多年”改革开放“，中国积累了很多财富，日本突然扑上来，像一只野狼咬住牛蛋一样，把中国放倒，然后其他猛兽一起扑上，把中国洗劫一空。现在，中国改革开放又三十年了，又弄了不少钱，它们又眼红了。特别是看到很多中国人没有警惕不思进取，更觉得有机可乘。

　　所以，美国率领欧洲的那一群老的食肉动物，又带了亚洲的一群小动物，在中国这只大黄牛身边转来转去，寻找下手的地方和时机－－有的公然占有中国海岛，大肆攫取中国资源；有的把石头当钻石卖给中国，有的……举世无不以欺压中国为能。

　　我预感未来中国要么会遇到巨大的内部*，或周边此起彼伏的战争，要么两者一起来。一旦打起来，乱起来，时间就短不了。我判断美国不会直接和中国打，因为大国之间动起来，地动山摇，而且美国从来都是让别人打头阵，等人家打累了，自己再上。可能先发生周边地区的战争，美国干预，先消耗中国。这些战争除南海以外都有可能引发核战争。等中国打累了周边也打累了，美国就该出来了，像两次世界大战一样，当渔翁，拣走亚洲五十年发展的成果。

　　为什么是2020和2030年？看看美国给自己军队定的转型时间表就知道了。到2025年左右，美国现在的四大军种，全部转型完毕。那时，它还有两个新军种，一个是天军，一个是网军，这两个是主力。六大军种，采取”一小时打遍全球“理论。美国以往对小国，是斩首行动；未来对大国，是快速战略瘫痪。

　　我要简单地介绍一下美国的新军事战略。它一小时打遍全球的三大武器系统，一是安装常规弹头的三位一体的洲际导弹，二是空天轰炸机，三是太空武器和网络武器。之后，才是隐身空军和无人攻击机、机器人部队等。它的防御体系就是全球反导系统。攻防兼备。为了实施这一最新理论，美国一直在进行数字地球的工作，其实就是建立地球军事地理信息。它的侦察卫星已经把地球扫描完毕，它的飞行在全球的侦察机，进一步做信息补充。它们还通过美国公民全球的合法旅游，拍摄视频、照片，充实这一信息库。前两年中国在新疆和甘肃等地连续发现日本人搞测绘，其实就是在为日美提供战略信息。清朝时候日本就开始测量中国的地理了。现在又开始了。

　　为什么是2020年和2030年？还在于今天中国的发展模式，将在这个时候到达危险的临界点。

　　我们用票子吹起了一个气球。但是，气球会爆炸的，看看日本就知道，泡沫终将破灭。但是，日本是个高技术大国，又有美国的保护，它经济泡沫破灭了，只不过从头再来。中国呢？泡沫破灭之日，一定是战争来临之时。这一场战争，如果被我不幸言中，结局比一百年前还严重，我认为将被瓜分。美国、日本包括*，早就有”中国七块论“。我们不能只是当笑话听。2030年，当我的泡泡吹到最大的时候，也正好是美国和其他列强新型军队打造完毕，战刀出鞘的时候。回顾历史可以看出，每一次世界新军事革命完成之后，接下来都是世界政治格局的重新洗牌，掌握军事优势的一方，对军事劣势的一方进行血腥的屠杀，以夺取财富。我不知道，2030 年的时候，我们能不能在军事变革方面追上世界。因为，没有工业基础、技术基础、经济基础，拿什么追呢？战争打的就是工业，就是技术啊！我们的是大泡，人家的是大炮！到2030 年，人家是新型武器武装的新型军队，我们是新房子、新城市，正好做为新屠场，新坟墓！

　　我们现在全民大念和平经，但是别人在做什么呢？上世纪80 年代，美国在中国内陆几个省搞血样采集，名为科学实验，几十万人参加，我们有关部门还予以大力协助，一人给一包方便面。结果，2003年中国发生了”非典“，后来赖在果子狸头上。我们不要忘了，日本731部队全部的资料最后都给了美国。现在，基因武器已经问世。这种武器比核武器的威力大得多。有的国家已经研制出来了。这是真正的种族灭绝武器。美国还在研发影响气候的地球物理武器。2003 年俄罗斯的首席军事理论家就发出了这样的告警。2008年中国发生了前所未有的大雪灾。这些东西，都是隐藏很深的国家绝密。也许要很多年才会真相大白。但我们不能到那个时候才知道，我们应该聪明一点。

　　中国之所以没有特别强的危机感，一是我们到处喊和谐、和平，这本来是说给世界听的，却把自己的人们麻醉了。大家谁也不愿意想战争了。前不久在《环球时报》的那个关于未来十年发展的研讨会上，除了我跟王小东，谁都不提战争。复旦大学的沈丁力先生还从很高深的角度，论述了中国未来不会有战争。《环球时报》和稀泥，把我关于中国已被包围的文章跟他放一起发，交给中国人民自己去判断。

　　第二，就是因为还有个同病相怜的俄罗斯。美国在搞中国的同时，也在肢解着俄罗斯。美国要想控制世界，必须搞掉中、俄，控制欧亚大陆。中俄无论谁先倒，另一个都会唇亡齿寒。美国经常搞计算机推演，二战结束以来，美国制定了一千多份战争计划。

　　可以看到，*力量，香港*派，*功；*分子，*集团、热比娅集团，总后台无一不是美国，无一不是接受美国的政治、军事、舆论和经济支持。而美国支持这些中国分裂力量的目的，也只有一个，那就是让台湾和香港，不要融入大陆的统一发展进程，让大陆继续分裂，由外向内，最后解体。

　　根据俄罗斯的情况看，我判断，中国可能先于俄罗斯解体，而俄罗斯有可能将这个过程中崛起。中国的命运，既可以用孙子兵法的”庙算“推出来，也可以用现在最先进的计算机模拟技术推出来。可笑那些小官僚们还在算计着自己的乌纱和银两，口中念念有词什么崛起什么复兴。有这样一个短信，可做世相素描：哄领导开心就做做假，哄群众开心就做做秀，哄情人开心就做做A，哄自己开心就做做梦。所以，开始的时候，我说大家可以继续做梦。

　　可我还是要说，中华民族真的又到了最危险的时候。

　　黑格尔说：一个民族有一些仰望星空的人，他们才有希望。中国有几个这样的人？仰望星空的人，寥若晨星！中国太多的人，都在梦中。各有各的梦。

一个一个爱睡觉的中国人，构成了爱睡觉的中华民族。一个爱睡觉的民族，又演绎了一部爱睡觉的历史。1840年悲剧为什么会降临到中国头上？那是因为之前中国已经在睡梦中失去了资本主义革命时代；为什么后来又是长达一百年的悲剧？是因为中国人始终睡眼朦胧，直到卢沟桥拂晓的枪声响起。

从古至今，大国崛起，都是依靠外部资源，或者靠武力掠夺，或者靠技术合法赚取，以富裕自己的人民，然后富国强兵。美国全世界打来打去，为什么？就是夺资源，供它的人们享用；俄罗斯宣布北极主权，为什么？它已经有那么多资源，还拼命夺。就是为子孙夺。我们没有力量去世界夺，但我们要收回属于我们自己的地方。我们不能让和平的诚意和主张，变成别人束缚我们的绳索。我们要像正常国家一样行事。我一直主张，我们的军队，应该进行远征型改造，要能够保卫我们的资源和远洋利益。

　　我们要敢于迎接合理合法的战争，改善安全态势，刺激经济，振奋国民精神。新中国的稳定局面，和经济发展良好的时期，都是几场自卫反击作战的结果。狼是打走的，不是劝走的。

　　中国需要战略家，更需要坚定、勇敢和充满忧患意识的人民。世界上没有打不败的敌人，中国的面前也没有迈不过去的难关。最大的危险是看不到危险。我们的很多学者和官员，只看到鲜花美酒，GDP，眼睛盯着权位和女人，像一只短视的食草动物。

　　别睡了，朋友们！我们不能低级到只贪图安逸和肉体享受。我们不能为了钱失去所有的东西，我们不能穷得只剩下钱！

　　我们应该拥有高尚的目标和拥有一往无前的勇敢精神，敢于面对一切困难和挑战，敢于打破围堵，迎接胜利，为万世开太平，为子孙创造一个强汉盛唐式的新中国！

　　希望在你们和我们的身上，我们不能把属于我们的责任，交给下一代人！

　　当年抗日战争的时候，中国人有一句话：中国不亡，有我！

　　今天我们也要这么说：中国强大，有我！

　　祖国万岁！

《今日印度》杂志这两天可出大风头了，它的最新一期封面画了一张没有西藏和台湾的中国地图，下面是巴基斯坦地图，它的标题为 “中国的这只新鸡”，文中的进一步解释是：中国鸡正带着巴基斯坦小鸡钳制印度。

这种歇斯底里的地缘政治想象并不新鲜，《今日印度》的别出心裁之处在于它卸掉了中国的两块，也就是西藏和台湾。这引起笑声、嘘声和骂声一片。《今日印度》据称是该国发行量最大的杂志，也曾被认为是印度“最严肃”的媒体之一，它展示给世界的居然是这么一副熊样。

如果说主流媒体字里行间通常能表现出一个国家精英群体大致水平的话，《今日印度》可算给印度精英丢了丑。外界一直传有“两个印度”，一个是草根印度，是全球文盲最集中、文化素质最低的群体之一。另一个是精英印度，据称与美欧接轨，水平不低。但《今日印度》让人看到这个国家的精英也蛮像一群草包，他们有长期凌驾于大量印度草根之上而形成的浅薄傲慢，一旦碰到强者就意淫，幻想自己更强大。

当下正值中印边界对峙，印度一些精英恨中国，可以理解。很想把中国的西藏和台湾给割掉，也不难体会。但是他们知道没本事实现这些，就画一张图，拿到杂志封面上“望梅止渴”，他们能阿Q到这种程度，套用印度宝莱坞一部电影的名字，真是“我滴个神”!该杂志很得意地宣称这期封面被美国出版设计师协会评选为“今日最佳封面”，这尤其让人拍腿叫绝。印度以后碰什么难题，就请这本杂志设计师出来好了，全能摆平。

印度确实没有能力做中国的对手，印度官员近日的调门降下来了，因为他们看到解放军真的在做军事摊牌的准备，他们知道印度打不过，所以其外交国务部长V·K·辛格又最新表态，称印方正致力于找出当事国都能接受的友好方式解决边界对峙问题。然而中方的态度不会变，印度不依国际法撤军，我们就会逼它撤，在这之前不会同它谈判。

印度怎么有能力砍掉中国的西藏和台湾呢？它把吃奶的力气都使出来也做不到。能帮印度人解这个气的，只有杂志编辑了。假如中印想竞赛“分裂对方”的话，印度一定会输得连内裤都不剩。中国倒是真有能力把它的东北部各邦给搞独立了，如果中国“很生气”，想那么干的话。

印度还是老老实实把军队撤回到锡金段边界自己那一边算了，趁着中国的耐心还没最后用尽，它知趣些，面子总要丢的，但能留住多少就留住多少吧。中国一旦下决心全面反制，印度官员和媒体精英们只有互相打脸，指责对方把事情搞砸了的份。到时候他们骂中国就像骂喜马拉雅山一样毫无意义。

《今日印度》让我们看透了印度政策制定者身后的民族主义意识形态是多么低劣，它根本称不上是意志，而是乌合之众的叫嚣和嘈杂。既无法理又无道义，印度军队像一群混混一样就越过了中印边界。中国面临的根本不是如何收拾这些印度兵的问题，而是大批无赖凑到街市闹事同样不那么好处理的问题，但是恢复秩序的结局是确定的。当然，如果《今日印度》意淫的水平超高，活在梦幻世界中的印度就永远不会输。

苏联解体后，美国并没有放弃进一步肢解俄罗斯。从苏联解体30年的历史就能看出，俄罗斯经历了内战、颜色革命、北约东扩，一直到如今的俄乌战争，归根结底都是美国肢解俄罗斯的计划。

美国中情局制定的肢解俄罗斯计划，把俄罗斯分解为若干个小国，而且彻底销毁俄罗斯的核武器，美国就可以成为全球老大。

我们看到美国计划肢解俄罗斯的计划时，总认为这是俄美之间的事，与中国无关。其实美国也有肢解我国的计划，必须引起警惕。

壹 为什么要肢解中国？

很多人把美国当成“民主灯塔”，认为美国代表全球最先进、最民主、最自由的国家。但恰恰相反，美国只是用很多假象迷惑了全世界。

我国有名的军事专家戴旭曾经有一句话值得警惕，他说：“美国的第6次战略转移，就是包围和肢解中国！”他所说的第6次战略转移，是指美国历史上有过5次战略转移。之所以近几年对中国下手，因为中国已经成为美国第6次战略移的重要目的。

首先，美国历次战略目标确保了美国强大。

我们来看看美国历史上的5次战略转移，而且每次都帮助美国强大。

美国是一个新兴的国家，建国历史也才200多年。19世纪时，美国不甘于在北美当老大，强盗的基因再次发挥作用。而美国要想当老大，就需要把一个个曾经的老大打败，而那时的老大是西班牙，于是美西战争爆发。

美国的目标不仅是打败西班牙，还要肢解西班牙在全球的殖民地，进而向太平洋发展，并进入欧洲。

美国第一次战略转移很成功，而且得到西班牙很多殖民地。随后进入欧洲，继续向他们祖先生活地方拓展，并打败了欧洲老牌帝国英国和法国，美国又实现第二次战略转移。

美国在打败欧洲过程中，19世纪曾与欧洲列强侵略过中国，美国尝到通过战争获取利益的甜头。

二战初期，美国并没有介入战争，而是不断向交战国出售武器等战争急需品。美国大发战争财后，开始进场了，美国要实现第三次战略转移。二战胜利后，美国拿到最多的利益，成为最大的债权国，彻底肢解了欧洲。

二战后，全球进入冷战，形成了以美苏两个超级大国各自代表的阵营。美国此时最大的目标就是瓦解苏联，实现第四次战略转移。

美国用了近半个世界才肢解了苏联，顺利完成了战略转移。但美国并没有停止，他又把目标放在中东，因为此前中东是苏联的势力范围，美国无法进入。

苏联解体后，美国对中东进行了肢解，从海湾战争到伊拉克战争、叙利亚战争、也门内战、利比亚内战等，美国完成第5次战略转移，实现了巨大的利益。

其次，美国认为是中国威胁。

按理说，美国完成5次战略转移，获得了这么多利益，应该满足了，但美国并没有满足，而是把目标投向了中国，在美国眼里，中国成为美国最大的威胁。

有人会说了，现在美国介入俄乌冲突，打压俄罗斯，对中国没什么大的动作。其实这样想就错了，美国打压俄罗斯，实际上也是对付中国的前奏。俄罗斯完蛋了，下个必然是中国。

美国知道中国不好对付，因为70多年前，朝鲜战争中，中国在实力较弱的情况下，依然坚决出兵朝鲜，并打败了强大的美军。从那时起，美国对中国另眼看待，并搁置中国，想等到苏联崩溃后再下手。

但正是抗美援朝，让美国认识到一个强悍中国即将崛起。西方列强靠几门炮就能侵占中国的历史已经彻底过去了。

作为一个有着五千年历史的古老民族，美国肢解不会成功，但美国企图不会停止，因为不可能出现两个强大国家再次并存。

如今在世界上，能挑战美国的国家，只剩下中国。因为美国把肢解中国，作为第6次战略转移。

在美国眼里，中国是一个不一样的对手，从不参与国际冲突，默默无闻地发展自己。而中国改开几十年，经济成为仅次于美国的全球第二，中国也是全球具有最完备工业体系的国家，连美国也做不到。军事实力也位列全球第三。而且中国提出“一带一路”经济发展战略，在全球影响力变得越来越大，这样一个强大的国家，当然会被美国认为是威胁。

第三，肢解中国对美国好处？

肢解中国，除了让美国完成第六次战略转移，获得巨大利益外，对美国好处很多。

1.彻底称霸全球。

如果中国被肢解后，全球很难再有挑战美国霸权的国家，美国称霸全球的野心就实现，无人敢惹。不要认为我们现在对美国忍让，我们的战略计划中还没有与美国决战的计划。如果美国继续打压中国，必将失败。所以美国也不敢轻举妄动，他们目标是解体中国，让中国从此失去挑战美国的实力。

2.确保地缘优势。

如果中国被解体后，美国将获得亚洲更多地缘，特别是发达的东亚，将被美国控制。美国军事可以轻松控制亚洲。

3.获得巨额利益。

如果中国被肢解若干小国，美国将将获得天量的利益。可以奴役中国，把中国踩在脚下。

贰 如何肢解？

美国肢解任何一个国家都有计划和方案，不管时间多久，美国目标不会变。比如美国肢解苏联，用了半个多世纪。那么美国对中国如何肢解呢？

一是制定计划。

美国智囊团曾给美国总统提出分裂中国的战略构想，据说叫“2049”。这是一个什么样的构想呢？

据资料显示，2014年，美国智囊团提出将中国分裂为4块，并封锁中国贸易通道。提出这个分裂中国阴谋的就是美国有名的兰德公司。这家智库甚至把30年后中国民族问题而分裂的中国地图都画好。为了分裂并削弱中国，美国甚至构想用水雷封锁马六甲海峡，封锁中国海外贸易的通道。

二是迷惑中国。

为了实现分裂中国的目标，美国的兰德公司就模拟了1900余次台海战争。兰德公司曾在10年前研究报告称：在南海区域内部署反舰导弹，把中国军队封锁在第一岛链之内。

美国在肢解中国的各种手段并进，先是宣扬中国威胁论。在美国看来，改开后的中国实力不强增加，让美国意识到威胁，所以必须把“中国威胁论”先抛出来，让更多的国家参与到美国肢解中国的阴谋中来。

二战后，美国的目标就是称霸全球，这个目标并没有改变，到了奥巴马时提出的“全球领导权”。美国要想领导全球，就必然对威胁美国的国家下手。

中国长期韬光养晦的政策，期望和平发展。但有些国家却把中国这种发展策略当成忍让，侵占了中国很多岛礁，中国希望和平解决争端，但有些国家把中国克制视为软弱。其实我们和平解决争端的做法，并不是怕哪个国家。但中国韬光养晦的政策不会让美国放弃肢解中国阴谋。

美国还会以“民主自由”甚至“人权”面貌出现，不断指责中国“侵犯人权”，甚至“不民主”，想从内部搞乱中国。

三是全方位用劲。

美国肢解中国方式有很多，刚才我们提到了美国会采取一些迷惑性的做法，但美国也会用一些经常在全球使用的手法对中国下手。

小心“颜色革命”，这是美国用得最多，也是经验最丰富的手段。通过造谣抹黑中国，激起民众的不满，发动骚乱，进而颠覆一个国家的政权。美国“颜色革命”不会在中国实现，但我们也小心那些谣言。比如香港暴乱就是一个最大的教训。

通过篡改历史肢解中国，这也是美国常用的，美国已经在俄罗斯等国实施了，否定苏联历史，特别是否定苏联二战历史，险些让俄罗斯历史出现断层。同样，美国也用这种方式对中国，不断否定篡改一些历史。现在国内流行的一些历史虚无主义动向，不排除背后有美国黑手。比如现在出现的果粉、蒋粉以及否定日本侵华历史等，都是这个阴谋体系里的。

在民族问题上对中国下手。我们国家民族大团结局面来之不易，美国却不愿看到这种团结局面，想方设法地搞破坏，在我国新疆、西藏制造民族矛盾。

美国分裂中国图谋，会在各个方面阻止我们，比如对我国进行科技封锁，除了阻止我们发展外，最终目的还是肢解我们。还有军事、科技、航天、海洋、网络等领域，美国都可能会下手，所以我们一定要小心。

叁 导致的后果

如果中国被美国肢解后，美国就算完成了第6次战略转移，美国真正成为全球霸主。但中国会出现什么样的后果呢？

首先，战乱不断。我国是一个多民族国家，国家大一统情况下很安定。但如果被分裂，就必然引发内乱。苏联的例子已经验证了。

我们被分裂后，不仅出现内乱，而且西方列强会介入我们的内政，继续制造民族矛盾和仇恨，并在民族间制造更大更深的仇恨。

其次，进一步被“奴化”。美国会直接控制中国的舆论、经济，并彻底颠覆中国价值观，不断传播西方价值观，传播奴化的文化。这是极其危险的，有可能面临着亡种。

第三，内外分化。国家分裂后，整个社会将出现亲美与反亲美的斗争，社会裂痕加大，内耗不断。美国还会扶持“台独”、“藏独”、“疆独”等分裂势力，不断制造叛乱，彻底把中国消耗成弱国。国外那些亲华的国家也会被打压，美国会在中国周边建立反华联盟，对中国进行包围，并通过支持国内的分裂势力，不断消耗中国。就如车臣战争，美国背后支持车臣分裂武装。否则车臣战争根本不会发生。

第四，支持“洋奴”。中国在美国分化瓦解下，会不断出现叛乱。但为了获得利益，有些人会铤而走险，比如挟洋自立，或者加速分化。就如苏联解体后，15个国家迅速独立。但俄罗斯继承了大部分遗产，而美国依然不放过，继续瓦解俄罗斯。所以美国对中国也会用这样的办法。

我们也要看到，美国图谋实现后，我们国内会出现很多亲美势力，他们被美国彻底洗脑，就如苏联末期那些被洗脑的苏联人一样，他们与美国狼狈为奸，甘心当汉奸，对中华民族进行全方位的破坏。

肆 如何应对？

美国对中国肢解早就开始了，不仅有计划、有方式、有目标。现阶段如何应对呢？

首先要清除“内鬼”，也就是清除一批汉奸，这是对中国破坏力最大的一些“鬼”。内鬼不除，中华民族就危险，实际上就促成了美国的图谋。

内鬼不仅在民间，而且存在各行各业，有的甚至进入高层，对中国破坏力极大。他们会明里暗里配合美国，搞垮中国。所以第一步要“除内鬼”。

其次，要坚定民族自信心。无论美国有多坏，如何破坏中国，我们必须有定力，坚定中华民族必胜的自信心。及时澄清谣言，并打击制造者。还要不断揭露美国阴谋做法。不把美国阴谋当成秘密，要让多数人知道。

第三，要有血性。我们远离战争四十多年了，我们必须让新一代年轻人知道我们过去是什么，经历了什么，追寻先辈的血性。也要知道我们现在要干什么，大力宣传革命传统和革命烈士丰功伟绩，增强他们的血性，如果我们不占领，敌人就会占领，我们就危险了。

这里面既有历史自信，也有一个血性在里面。对于美国挑衅，我们该出手就出手，不能让年轻人看到“怕”，在中华民族里没有“怕”这个字。

普京为何敢于出手？

普京是为了战斗民族的血性延续，普京曾说，他不得不打，如果不打，危险更大。同理，我们也面临这种情况。

就如戴旭说的那句话：“一个国家和民族必须敢于亮剑，这是在这个丛林法则盛行的世界上赢得起码的尊严和生存权利。”

图片来源网络，版权归原作者。