Central Asia summit, rise of land power: China can make Urumqi a national central city中亚峰会，陆权崛起：中国可将乌鲁木齐设为国家中心城市
The Central Asia summit, the rise of land power, and a sudden change in the national situation.
After hundreds of years of sea power, China gradually rose as a continent-based country, and unexpectedly mediated the conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran, suddenly expanding its influence in the heartland of the Eurasian continent.
The national situation has changed, and the pattern of domestic cities will also undergo tremendous changes in the future.
National center, status symbol.
When the country establishes a national central city, it not only considers the economic strength of the city, but also considers core elements such as radiation capacity and traffic location.
At present, China has nine national central cities, namely:
Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Guangzhou. Chengyu, Wuhan, Zhengzhou, Xi'an.
It is mainly distributed in the eastern coast and the pan-inland hinterland (including Hubei and Henan in the core area of the inland, Sichuan and Chongqing on the southwestern edge of the inland, and Shaanxi on the western edge of the inland).
Starting from balancing regional development and taking into account strategic security,
China will give priority to three new national central cities in the future:
Shenyang, Northeast transportation hub, Northeast regional center.
Lanzhou, the hub of the Northwest, controls the Western Regions.
Urumqi: The future of Xinjiang is crucial.
(2) Prosperity in the Eastern Conference, life and death in the Western Conference: Xinjiang is crucial
The Eastern Jue is prosperous, and the Western Jue is life and death.
Luo Tianhao believes that although the east is a prosperous and prosperous place, it is the west that really determines China's national strategic security. Although it has become a land and sea amphibious power in modern times. But China is traditionally a landlocked country, and the soul of the country is hidden deep in the interior.
The west is the region with the richest ecological resources and mineral resources in China. In the ranking of China's natural resource provinces and autonomous regions, all of them are western provinces. In the national ecological environment, the west is the source of great rivers, which is very important. At the same time, Qinghai-Tibet is also the water tower of China.
The west is the biggest barrier to China's strategic security.
The mountains in the west are vertical and horizontal, with the Hengduan Mountains in the east, the Himalayas in the south, the Kunlun Mountains in the west, the Qilian Mountains in the middle, and the Altai Mountains and Tianshan Mountains in the north. Naturally isolate China from South Asia and Central Asia.
Historically, the west is the barrier of the Central Plains, and the east-west line is the life and death line of China.
In the 1,000 years before the Tang Dynasty, most powerful regimes established Chang'an as their capital, and controlled the Western Regions through the Hexi Corridor. The Western Regions have not been able to rise to strong regimes. The 36 countries in the Western Regions in the Han Dynasty were all small countries, which were not enough to compete with the Central Plains regime.
In the prosperous Han and Tang Dynasties, China not only had seaports, but more importantly, the land Silk Road. China communicated with Central Asia and Europe through the Western Regions, and spread its prestige in the world. Its economy and culture are strong, and it has been ahead of the world for thousands of years.
As long as the Western Regions are under control, the Central Plains regime will have flexibility. During the civil strife in the Tang Dynasty, the emperor went to the west to hide from the disaster many times. During the Anshi Rebellion, Emperor Xuanzong of Tang fled to Chengdu to gain a respite and gradually wiped out the Anshi forces in Northeast China. In the mid-Tang Dynasty, the feudal towns rebelled, and Tang Dezong fled to Longxi and Hanzhong for refuge; at the end of the Tang Dynasty, Huang Chao rebelled, and Tang Xizong also fled to Sichuan.
The loss of a strategic location affects thousands of years.
The greatest loss of the Zhao family in the Great Song Dynasty was not the sixteen prefectures of Yanyun in the east, but the loss of control over the west, which led to a thousand years of aggrieved future generations.
Since the Song Dynasty, due to the establishment of Tokyo as its capital, it gradually lost control of the Western Regions, which led to Xixia becoming big. Facing the successive rises of the Liao and Jin in the north, the Song Dynasty could not avoid the West, and its strategic space was greatly compressed.
The center of the Central Plains regime moved eastward, and the empire enjoyed its prosperity, but it lost the most important barrier in the west, and lost the space for strategic adjustment. The Mongolian soldiers and Qing soldiers finally attacked the Central Plains regime, adopting the strategy of opening up the west first, and then gradually driving the southeast from the west, searching the mountains and seas, and the Central Plains regime had no retreat. Later generations were also inspired by this to discover the Hu Huanyong line.
In contemporary China, the west is still crucial. In the future, China's One Belt One Road strategy will inevitably be promoted through Xinjiang, and the competition among countries in South Asia and Southeast Asia can also be achieved through the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.
The life and death of Xijue is the same in ancient and modern times.
Xi'an is the beginning of the Northwest, and Urumqi is another hub.
(3) It is suggested that Urumqi be upgraded to a national central city
Gateway to Central Asia, center of Eurasia.
The importance of Urumqi does not lie in economy, but in politics and military affairs.
Urumqi is the strategic core of northern and southern Xinjiang, and the hub of Central Asia, which will determine China's stability or war in the next century.
Urumqi's economy is not outstanding, but its military and political importance is second only to Beijing in China. Just look at the density of the police force.
An important outpost of the One Belt One Road strategy. It is the most developed city in the Western Regions. Economic reforms have been fruitful.
The net inflow of Wumumuqi accounted for a quarter of the population, ranking first among the northern provincial capitals (capitals). Broad and open.
Xinjiang's ethnic, cultural, and religious governance and reform have had a profound impact on China.
Xinjiang is a buffer between China and many countries of Islamic civilization, and it is crucial to the unity and stability of China.
Among other things, the two cities with the highest military and police density in China, Beijing and Urumqi, needless to say.
With the rise of land power in the future, Urumqi will become the central city for China's exchanges with Central Asian countries, with a bright future.
In the past few years, the promotional copy of "Chinese people eat less meat" can often be seen on the Internet, but this year it suddenly disappeared.
Because the donor's father who put in the copywriting is having a hard time.
On May 11, the stock price of Beyond Meat, a California-based "artificial meat" giant, plummeted again within a week, leaving less than $10 per share.
After its first listing in July 2019, Beyond Meat's stock price once rose to $239.
Wall Street's Goldman Sachs said the company's business has shrunk significantly and it has lost money every year since its public offering. As of the end of the first quarter (April 1), Beyond Meat's assets (cash and cash equivalents) were $259 million, less than one-tenth of 2020.
And its competitor, Impossible Foods, another artificial meat giant in the United States, is also in the same situation, and has been laying off, layoffs, and layoffs since last year.
IRI (American Information Resources Corporation) data cited by Bloomberg reported that "alternative meat" (artificial meat) companies are in crisis.
Therefore, we will not see overwhelming publicity for artificial meat this year.
In fact, the artificial meat giants in the United States have bet their lives on the Chinese market and stormed the Chinese market for three consecutive years.
But if you understand their marketing methods, you will come to one conclusion: they deserve it!
Fudge failure
"Artificial meat" (or alternative meat, plant meat) is nothing new to the Chinese. There are records of vegetarian chicken and duck in temples as early as more than 1,000 years ago. Earlier, there was a record of tofu products in "Huainanzi" in the Western Han Dynasty, and later there was a saying of "supplementing meat with vegetables".
The Chinese are not against this kind of ingredients. If American "artificial meat" companies operate honestly, they may be able to gain some market in China.
But they all chose: Fudge! It's polite to say "fudge". There are three main methods:
1. Moral kidnapping
2. Brainwashing of values
3. Chinese people have "original sin"
The moral kidnapping of Chinese people was fired at the beginning of 2020, and it was the most authoritative loudspeaker in the United States, the "New York Times"
On January 7, 2020, the English and Chinese editions of The New York Times simultaneously published an article - "Will the Chinese Buy Artificial Meat?" ("Will China buy fake meat?")
Its logic is horrible:
Because the Chinese eat a lot of meat, the global meat supply has increased significantly. In order to raise more pigs, cattle and sheep, more arable land and rainforest have to be occupied, which has aggravated the damage to the environment. Leading to water shortages, high temperatures, and the destruction of the Amazon rainforest...
Therefore: "Every time the Chinese eat a piece of meat, a puff of smoke rises from the Amazon rainforest."
Said this is the aforementioned Impossible Foods CEO Pat Brown.
It is the American artificial meat company that has paid huge sums of money for the "New York Times" to publish the article.
This article has carried out a moral kidnapping of the Chinese people, trying to make the Chinese people feel guilty under the "criticism" of the mainstream Western media.
Of course, the article also gave the Chinese a chance to "redeem" -- to eat artificial meat from the United States.
As soon as the "New York Times" published an article, various propaganda "squads" also launched an attack on the Chinese public opinion field. There are not too many advantages of artificial meat: the taste is the same as that of animal meat, and it does not gain weight. Compared with animal meat, artificial meat of the same weight has 90% less fat, but four times more protein...
In May 2020, a Chinese-American female editor of a certain media in the United States went on the stage in person and tried the artificial meat and animal meat of Beyond Meat. The conclusion was that the taste was indistinguishable.
In order to increase persuasiveness, they also let children appear on camera to prove it.
The conclusion is that artificial meat is "delicious", no different from the usual steaks and pork chops, and has higher nutritional value.
After the Spring Festival in 2020, "the theory that Chinese people are guilty of eating meat" began to infiltrate China. The NGO organization "WildAid" (WildAid) appealed to the Chinese people: "Eat less pork and protect the earth."
The person in charge of the organization said that if the Chinese could eat half less pork, China's greenhouse gas emissions would be reduced by 10%.
The U.S. plant-based meat company behind the scenes has also funded and launched a celebrity charity event called "Less Meat Is My Food." Advertisements of this kind have been placed everywhere on the streets, bus bodies, and subway stations of major Chinese cities.
Stars who participated in the publicity said that this is to promote a concept of healthy eating. But not to mention that they received money, their fans really thought it was a charity event.
At the same time, Trump, Pompeo, and the others are promoting steaks in the agricultural states of the United States, encouraging the United States to eat more steaks, and supporting the livestock industry in agricultural states.
Americans eat steak to enjoy delicious food, but Chinese people eat meat, but it makes the rainforest bloom.
I don’t know if the tropical rain forest is smoking or not. I only know that the ancestral grave of the boss of the American plant-based meat company is smoking.
If the Chinese accept the concept of "less meat, no meat", then they have to accept the concept of "de-industrialization", and environmental protection is paramount. If you can't even eat meat, why do you need industrial production?
But a China without the support of modern industry will surely return to the situation it was more than a hundred years ago.
The U.S. population only accounts for 4.2% of the world’s population, but it consumes more than 15% of the world’s meat and accounts for 18.4% of the world’s carbon emissions. It actually has the face to stand on the moral high ground and accuse the Chinese of eating too much meat.
After laying the groundwork for moral kidnapping and public opinion, the next step is the brainwashing of values.
Through the earnest persuasion and education of those stars and celebrities, some people really think that if they don’t eat meat, they are in line with the Western “civilized world” and they are divorced from China’s “backward values”.
Some parents even took their children to participate in the "Change the World with Every Bite" activity organized by NGOs, and they were complacent. Organizers are also particularly fond of using teenagers as protagonists in promotional images.
Can the developing Chinese teenagers grow up healthily if they eat less or no meat? Of course not.
What did the United States do by itself? There must be rich animal protein on the table of American students, as well as grains, fruits, vegetables and milk, etc. Seafood is free to choose.
American mainstream media and NGOs are guiding Chinese children to eat less or no meat, and to eat artificial meat as much as possible. Did you stop talking about human rights? A moment of human rights cards, a moment of environmental protection cards, playing really smoothly.
In June 2021, another documentary director, traveler, and "world citizen" appeared on the Internet to persuade Chinese people not to eat seafood, "be a responsible consumer" and protect the marine environment.
Meat is not allowed to eat, and seafood is not allowed to eat. What is the reason? He had to delete Weibo after being scolded by Chinese netizens.
From May 2021 to the first half of 2022, Beyond Meat will make a final push. They continue to recruit Chinese female stars to express their noble "values".
In a 40-minute video, a female star surnamed Zhang constantly talked about the benefits of "vegetarian food", and said that she had not eaten beef for 20 years and only focused on vegetarian food.
But netizens found many photos of her delicious food, and it's simply not a pleasure.
Therefore, everyone kept questioning her on the barrage.
The "mental experience of being a vegetarian" in this video is just a line spoken through her mouth.
She only mentioned eating "artificial meat" in the last two minutes. This is the means of "brainwashing values" and then forcing you to accept artificial meat.
Beyond Meat also invited many domestic female celebrities, male celebrities, and health experts to engage in this set of brainwashing marketing, and it really spared no expense.
When a company spends its money mainly on bluffing, is the product itself any good?
At the end of 2022, the American media broke the hygiene scandal of Beyond Meat. The factory's production workshop is full of residues, and the operation of the equipment neither meets safety requirements nor hygiene standards.
Mold was growing on the walls and listeria was growing in the workshop. In 2021, it was also found by the California health department that there are many pollutants in artificial meat products, including rope, metal, wood chips, and plastic.
Food safety lawyer Bill Marler said after seeing some of the photos, "It takes a while for the mold to grow - it highlights the chronic lack of sanitation in the factory. If cleanliness was 1 and dirty was 10, I would give 8 points for the factory."
This is the real situation of "noble" artificial meat in the United States.
Beyond Meat artificial meat is more expensive than animal meat in American supermarkets. Naturally, few people care about it, and Americans don't like to eat it.
Why sell so expensive? Because the B price cannot be lowered, all its hope lies in the Chinese market.
And some Chinese people who think they have "original sin" still believe that this is clean, advanced, and technologically rich "alternative meat". Do you still think it is expensive? Is it more expensive than real meat in the United States?
People who think they have "original sin" are the consumer groups that Beyond Meat hopes to obtain. For them, this is not "artificial meat", but "indulgence coupons". What price are you talking about? If the Chinese can eat it, that is the grace of the Americans.
Don't eat meat, don't eat seafood, is this a plan to cultivate immortality?
If we usually eat a lot of meat, we will naturally eat some vegetarian food. This is a choice for dietary adjustment. Does the New York Times need you to preach morality and create a sense of guilt? Then remove all the steak, pork chop and turkey from your table, OK?
In fact, Westerners just want to evade their environmental protection responsibilities. I let go of eating big fish and meat, but I want to restrict Chinese people from eating meat and seafood.
Companies like Beyond Meat are on the verge of bankruptcy, which shows that the vast majority of Chinese people don't take this at all.
These companies died early and were born early, and the Internet can be much quieter.
When are they most desperate for the Chinese market? do you know?
It's the Zibo barbecue that is so popular in the sky. Seeing this nationwide hot scene, they really give up.
Whoever wants to fool Chinese people into not eating meat, go ahead and dream.
We should eat and drink, otherwise how can we have the strength to build a country?
At present, artificial meat refers to two types: one is meat based on plant protein, and the other is meat obtained by extracting animal cells in a laboratory and independently cultivating them in a bioreactor. At present, what we see on the market is mainly the first artificial meat based on plant protein.
Common questions about artificial meat mainly include the following aspects.
Is artificial meat nutritious?
Meat is rich in nutrients such as protein, fat, minerals and vitamins. The high-quality protein, iron and vitamin B12 needed by humans are mainly obtained from meat.
At present, through corresponding technologies, some artificial meat has basically possessed the nutrients that humans need to obtain from meat. Moreover, the problems of high content of saturated fat, trans fat and cholesterol in meat products have also been successfully circumvented in artificial meat.
However, not all artificial meat products have reached the relevant standards. Consumers are advised to pay attention to the food labels of the products when purchasing, especially the content of iron and vitamin B12. If they are insufficient, they should also be fully supplemented from other foods to meet the Recommended daily intake.
How does artificial meat taste?
The taste of artificial meat has been widely recognized. In activities such as blind tasting, many consumers said that they could not distinguish artificial meat from real meat, which to a certain extent recognized the taste of artificial meat products.
But in real life, due to product quality differences, psychological factors and other reasons, consumers may still feel the difference in the process of eating.
What is the current status of artificial meat development? How many people are eating artificial meat?
A market research company conducted a survey in the United States, excluding vegetarians, about 70% of the respondents ate plant-based food once a week to replace meat. Twenty-two percent of respondents said they were doing this with increasing frequency.
What is the significance of the introduction of artificial meat?
Brown, the promoter of artificial meat, mentioned in an interview with Caijing Tianxia that reducing meat consumption and choosing alternatives will contribute to the protection, conservation of earth resources, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
· Population needs
Global surveys show that global human demand for meat has quadrupled in the past forty years. It is estimated that by 2050, the total global population is expected to reach 9 billion. The current development of animal husbandry cannot solve the growing demand for meat from the masses. The introduction of artificial meat can make up for the gap in demand for meat.
· Agricultural resources
As demand for meat grows, the land, water and feed resources necessary for livestock development are threatened. Statistics show that to produce 1 kg of beef requires about 13 kg of grain feed and 5,000 gallons of water. To produce 1 kg of artificial meat, only about 400 grams of soy protein raw materials are required. The introduction of artificial meat reduces the resource pressure on land, water and feed.
· Environmental health
A study by the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom found that artificial meat can slow down global warming, because artificial meat will reduce energy consumption by 35% to 60% compared with traditional animal husbandry, occupy 98% less land and produce more than 80% less greenhouses gas.
· Disease spread
In the process of meat animal breeding and sales, if the handling is improper, the staff will have the risk of infection. In the process of eating, unqualified quarantine, incomplete processing, etc., may put consumers at risk of infection. If artificial meat is eaten instead of meat, the transmission of certain zoonotic infectious diseases can be reduced to a certain extent.
· animal protection
Animal defenders have always opposed the slaughter of animals. The development of artificial meat can solve the contradiction between meat demand and animal protection.
中亚峰会，陆权崛起，国势突变。
前几年在网上经常可以看到的“中国人少吃肉”的宣传文案，今年却一下子不见了。
因为投放文案的金主爸爸的日子很不好过了。
5月11日，总部位于美国加州的“人造肉”巨头Beyond Meat公司股价在一周之内再次暴跌，每股只剩下不到10美元。
而在2019年7月首次上市后，Beyond Meat股价曾一度升至239元美元。
华尔街高盛集团称该公司业务已经严重萎缩，而且自公开募股以来，每年都在亏损。截止一季度结束（4月1日），Beyond Meat资产（现金和现金等价物）为2.59亿美元，不到2020年十分之一。
而它的竞争对手，美国另一家人造肉巨头Impossible Foods公司也是同病相怜，自去年以来一直在裁员、裁员、裁员。
彭博社引用的IRI（美国信息资源公司）数据报道称，“替代肉”（人造肉）企业正陷入危机之中。
因此，我们今年看不到铺天盖地的人造肉宣传盛况。
实际上，美国的人造肉巨头把身家性命都赌在了中国市场上，连续三年猛攻中国市场，最终结局是惨败而归。
但如果你了解它们的营销手段，就会得出一个结论：活该！
忽悠失败
“人造肉”（或叫替代肉、植物肉）对中国人来说并不是什么新鲜事，寺庙里的素鸡、素鸭记载早在1000多年前就有了。更早还有西汉时期的《淮南子》的豆腐制品记载，后来还有“以素托荤”的说法。
中国人对这类食材并不排斥，美国“人造肉”企业要是老老实实经营，或许能在中国获得一些市场。
但它们都选择了：忽悠！说“忽悠”还算客气了，它们主要手段有三种：
一、道德绑架
二、价值观洗脑
三、中国人有“原罪”
对中国人进行道德绑架这一炮是在2020年初打响的，出手的是美国最权威的大喇叭《纽约时报》
2020年1月7日，《纽约时报》英文版和中文版同时发表文章-《 中国人会购买人造肉吗？》（《Will China buy fake meat?》）
它的逻辑非常可怕：
因为中国人大量吃肉，导致全球肉类供应量大增，为了饲养更多猪牛羊，就要占用更多的耕地和雨林，加剧了对环境的破坏。导致缺水、高温，以及亚马逊雨林被毁等问题……
因此 ：“中国人每吃一块肉，亚马逊雨林里就冒出一股烟”。
说这话的就是上面提到的Impossible Foods的首席执行官帕特•布朗。
出巨资让《纽约时报》发文的就是美国人造肉企业。
此文对中国人进行了道德绑架，要让中国人在西方主流媒体的“批评”之下产生负罪感。
当然文中也给了中国人“赎罪”机会--吃美国的人造肉。
《纽约时报》一发文，接着各种宣传“小分队”也向中国舆论场发起了进攻。人造肉优点不要太多：口感跟动物肉质一样，而且不长胖，同样重量人造肉比动物肉少了90%脂肪，却多了四倍蛋白质……
2020年5月，美国某家媒体的一名华裔女编辑还亲自上场，试吃Beyond Meat公司的人造肉和动物肉，结论是：口味分辨不出。
为了增加说服力，它们还让小孩子出镜证明。
结论是人造肉“很好吃”，跟平时吃的牛排、猪排没什么两样，而且营养价值更高。
2020年春节过后，“中国人吃肉有罪论”就开始向中国进行渗透，NGO组织“野生救援”(WildAid)对中国人发出呼吁：“少吃猪肉，保护地球”。
该组织负责人称，如果中国人能少吃一半猪肉，中国温室气体排放量将减少10%。
躲在背后的美国人造肉公司还出资推出了“少肉，才是我的菜”的明星公益活动，在中国大城市的街头、公交车车身、地铁站到处投放这类广告。
参与宣传的明星们说，这是为了推广一种健康饮食理念。但不说自己收了钱，它们的粉丝真以为这是公益活动。
与此同时，特朗普、蓬佩奥他们却在美国农业州推销牛排，鼓励美国多吃牛排，支持农业州的畜牲业。
美国人吃牛排叫享受美食，中国人吃肉却会让雨林冒林。
热带雨林冒不冒烟我不知道，我只知道美国人造肉公司老板的祖坟缺德带冒烟了。
如果中国人接受了“少肉、无肉”观念，接下来，就得接受“去工业化”观念，环保至高无上嘛。你连肉都不能吃了，还要什么工业生产？
但一个没有现代工业支撑的中国，必将回到一百年多前的局面。
美国人口仅占全世界4.2%，却消耗着全球15%以上肉类，碳排放占全球18.4%。它居然有脸站在道德高地上指责中国人吃肉太多。
在经过道德绑架舆论铺垫之后，接下来就是价值观洗脑了。
通过那些明星、名人苦口婆心地说服教育，有的人真的以为自己不吃肉，便是与西方“文明世界”接轨了，便脱离了中国“落后的价值观”。
一些家长甚至带着小孩去参加NGO组织的“用每一口改变世界”的活动，还沾沾自喜。组织者也特别喜欢用青少年作为宣传图片主角。
正在发育期的中国青少年如果少吃肉或不吃肉，能健康成长吗？当然不能。
美国自己是什么做的？美国学生餐桌上必须要有丰富的动物蛋白质，还要有谷物、水果、蔬菜和牛奶等，海鲜则可以自由选择。
美国主流媒体和NGO却在引导中国小孩少吃肉、不吃肉，尽量吃人造肉。说好的人权不讲了？一会人权牌，一会环保牌，玩得真顺手。
2021年6月，网上又冒出一个纪录片导演、旅行家、“世界公民”劝中国人不要吃海鲜，“做一个有责任的消费者”，保护海洋环境。
肉不让吃，海鲜也不让吃了，这是什么道理？在被中国网友们痛骂后，他不得不删除了微博 。
2021年5月到2022年上半年，Beyond Meat公司进行最后一搏，它们不断找来中国女明星，来述说其高尚的“价值观”。
在一段长达40分钟的视频中，一位张姓女明星不断地讲述“素食”的好处，还说自己有20年不吃牛肉了，只注重素食。
但网友们翻出了她许多美食照，简直是无肉不欢。
所以，大家在弹幕上不断地质问她。
这段视频里的“吃素心路经历”，只不过是借她的嘴说出来的台词罢了。
她在最后两分钟才把吃“人造肉”说出来，这就是“价值观洗脑”再强迫你接受人造肉的手段。
Beyond Meat公司还请了很多国内女明星、男明星、健康专家来搞这一套洗脑营销，真的是不惜血本。
当一家公司将钱主要用在忽悠时，它的产品本身还好得了吗？
2022年底，美国媒体爆出Beyond Meat的卫生丑闻。该厂生产车间残渣到处都是，设备操作既不符合安全要求，也不符合卫生标准。
墙上长满霉菌，车间李斯特菌丛生。2021年还被加州卫生部门发现在人造肉产品中存在多种污染物，包括绳子、金属、木屑、塑料。
食品安全律师比尔·马勒在看过一些照片后说，“霉菌的生长需要一段时间——这凸显了工厂里的卫生长期不到位，如果整洁是1分，肮脏是10分，我会给该厂8分。”
这就是“高贵”的美国人造肉真实状况。
Beyond Meat人造肉在美国超市卖得比动物肉还贵，自然很少有人问津，美国人也不爱吃这些。
为什么要卖这么贵？因为B格不能降，它的全部希望在于中国市场。
而那些自认有“原罪”的一些中国人，到现在还相信这是干净、先进、科技含量十足的“替代肉”，你还嫌贵？人家在美国卖得比真肉还贵好吗？
自认有“原罪”的人就是Beyond Meat希望获得的消费群体，对他们来说，这不叫“人造肉”，这是“赎罪券”，还谈什么价格？中国人能吃到，那就是美国人开恩了。
不吃肉，不吃海鲜，这是打算修仙吗？
我们平时如果肉吃多了，自然也会吃点素，这是饮食调节的选择，用得着你《纽约时报》来进行道德说教，并制造罪恶感？那先把你们餐桌上的牛排猪扒火鸡都撤掉再说，OK？
其实西方人就是想逃避自己的环保责任。自己放开了猛吃大鱼大肉，却要限制中国人吃肉吃海鲜。
Beyond Meat这些公司濒临倒闭，说明绝大多数中国人根本不吃这一套。
这些公司早死早超生，网上也能清静很多。
它们对中国市场最绝望是在什么时候？你知道吗？
就是淄博烧烤火出天际，看到这种全国性的火爆场面，它们才真的死心了。
谁想忽悠中国人不吃肉，做梦去吧。
我们该吃吃，该喝喝，不然哪有力气建设国家？
目前，人造肉指的是两种：一种是以植物蛋白为基础的肉，还有一种是在实验室提取动物细胞、利用生物反应器独立培养得到的肉。目前我们在市面上看到的，主要是第一种，以植物蛋白为基础的人造肉。
关于人造肉的常见疑问主要包含以下方面。
人造肉有营养吗？
肉类中富含蛋白质、脂肪、矿物质和维生素等营养成分。人类所需的优质蛋白质、铁及维生素B12主要从肉类中获取。
目前，通过相应技术，部分人造肉已经基本具备了人类所需从肉类中获取的营养物质。并且，肉类食品饱和脂肪、反式脂肪和胆固醇含量高的问题，也在人造肉中被成功规避。
但是并不是所有人造肉产品都达到了相关标准，建议消费者在选购时注意关注产品的食物标签，尤其是铁及维生素B12的含量，如果不足，还应该从其他食品中得到充分补充，达到每日推荐摄入量。
人造肉的口感如何？
人造肉的口感得到了广泛认可。在盲品试吃等活动上，很多消费者表示无法分辨出人造肉与真正的肉类，这一定程度上认可了人造肉产品的口感。
但是在实际生活中，因为产品质量差异，心理因素等原因，消费者在食用过程中可能仍然感觉到差异。
目前人造肉的发展现状如何？有多少人在吃人造肉呢？
一家市场调研公司在美国进行了一项调查，排除素食主义者，约70%的调查对象每周吃一次植物性食品以代替肉食。22%的调查对象表示，他们这种做法的频率在逐渐升高。
人造肉的推出有什么意义？
人造肉的推动者布朗在《财经天下》的访谈中提到，减少肉类食用，选择代替品，对于保护、节约地球资源、降低温室气体排放都有贡献。
· 人口需求
全球调查显示，在过去的四十年中，全球人类对于肉类的需求翻了三番。预计到2050年，全球总人口预计将达到90亿。目前的畜牧业发展情况无法解决群众日益增长的肉类需求。人造肉的推出可以弥补肉类的需求缺口。
· 农业资源
伴随肉类需求的增长，畜牧业发展所必需的土地、水和饲料资源受到威胁。资料显示，生产1公斤牛肉，大约需要13公斤的谷物饲料，5000加仑的水。而生产1公斤的人造肉，所需豆类蛋白质原料仅约400克。人造肉的推出减少了土地、水与饲料的资源压力。
· 环境健康
英国牛津大学的一项研究发现, 人造肉可以减缓全球气候变暖, 因为人造肉将比传统畜牧业减少35%到60%的能耗、少占用98%的土地和少产生80%以上的温室气体。
· 疾病传播
在肉类动物养殖、销售的过程中，如果处理不当，工作人员均有感染的风险，在食用过程中，不合格的检疫、未完全加工等，都可能使消费者有感染等风险。如果食用人造肉来代替肉类，便可在一定程度上减少特定人畜共患传染病的传播。
· 动物保护
动物保护者一直反对屠杀动物，人造肉的发展可以解决肉类需求与动物保护的矛盾。
评论
发表评论